ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2020
Walking cadence (steps/min) and intensity in 41 to 60-year-old adults: the CADENCE-adults study.
Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Cadence and Intensity Across the Adult Lifespan
A Distance-based, Randomized Controlled Trial for Reducing Sedentary Behaviour Among Prostate Cancer Survivors
Simplification of PHysical Activity Assessment by Rapid Interrogation - Phase 2
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Effect of Sedentary Behaviour on Cardiorespiratory Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Pooled it
- Daily steps and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of 15 international cohorts.The Lancet. Public health · 2022Pooled it
- Personalized Mobile App-Based Messaging and Step Tracking for Improving Walking Behavior in Adults: Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Functional Capacity at Rehabilitation Discharge Predicts Physical Activity Characteristics 24 Weeks Later for People With Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Music Tempo: A Tool for Regulating Walking Cadence and Physical Activity Intensity in Overweight Adults?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Trial
- Audit of the Tasmanian Transport-Related Physical Activity Policy Environment-Lessons for Comprehensive Policy Making.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026Article
- Associations between physical activity, sleep patterns and diet quality and menstrual health symptoms in midlife: evidence from the 1970 British Cohort Study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Physical activity patterns in chronic kidney disease.BMC nephrology · 2026Observational
- Reallocating morning physical activity to later-day activity and its association with type 2 diabetes incidence: The Maastricht Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Ambulatory Tasks and Journeys: A Framework for Free-Living Behaviour.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Snacktivity in older women: accelerometer-derived step counts, cadence, and bout patterns associated with adiposity.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Limitations of Daily Step Count for Assessing Health in Older Adults: The Need to Consider Walking Intensity.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Step cadence to guide physical activity intensity in coronary heart disease.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Nine-year follow-up of 24-hour movement behaviors and glucose metabolism status among adults from the Maastricht study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Individualized walking cadence thresholds of moderate to vigorous intensity for Taiwanese obese young adults.BMC public health · 2025Observational
- Effectiveness of an mHealth-based impact exercise program for bone health in postmenopausal women: a randomised controlled trial protocol.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn younger adults (i.e., those < 40 years of age) a walking cadence of 100 steps/min is a consistently supported threshold indicative of absolutely-defined moderate intensity ambulation (i.e., ≥ 3 metabolic equivalents; METs). Less is known about the cadence-intensity relationship in adults of middle-age. PURPOSE: To establish heuristic (i.e., evidence-based, practical, rounded) cadence thresholds for absolutely-defined moderate (3 METs) and vigorous (6 METs) intensity in adults 41 to 60 years of age.
methodsIn this cross-sectional study, 80 healthy adults of middle-age (10 men and 10 women representing each 5-year age-group between 41 to 60 years; body mass index = 26.0 ± 4.0 kg/m
resultsThe regression model identified 101.7 (95% Predictive Interval [PI]: 54.9-110.6) and 132.1 (95% PI: 122.0-142.2) steps/min as optimal cadence thresholds for 3 METs and 6 METs, respectively. Corresponding values based on ROC models were 98.5 (95% Confidence Intervals [CI]: 97.1-104.9) and 117.3 (95% CI: 113.1-126.1) steps/min. Considering both modeling approaches, the selected heuristic thresholds for moderate and vigorous intensity were 100 and 130 steps/min, respectively.
conclusionsConsistent with our previous report in 21 to 40-year-old adults, cadence thresholds of 100 and 130 steps/min emerged as heuristic values associated with 3 and 6 METs, respectively, in 41 to 60-year-old adults. These values were selected based on their utility for public health messaging and on the trade-offs in classification accuracy parameters from both statistical methods. Findings will need to be confirmed in older adults and in free-living settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.