Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33167956›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2020

Area based stratified random sampling using geospatial technology in a community-based survey.

Carrie R Howell, Wei Su, Ariann F Nassel, April A Agne, Andrea L Cherrington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carrie R HowellDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Medical Towers 62, 1717 11th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA. chowell@uabmc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6554-6237
Wei SuSchool of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1665 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
Ariann F NasselSchool of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1665 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA.
April A AgneDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Medical Towers 62, 1717 11th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA.
Andrea L CherringtonDepartment of Medicine, Division of Preventive Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Medical Towers 62, 1717 11th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL, 35205, USA.

Funding

University of Alabama at Birmingham's Diabetes Research CenterP30DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Kirk Michael Habegger · 2013 to 2026
$19.5M
Molecular and Soc. Determinants of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders in YouthU54MD008176 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FOUAD, MONA N. · 2012 to 2016
$13.7M
UAB Diabetes Research and Training CenterP60DK079626 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GARVEY, W TIMOTHY · 2008 to 2012
$8.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS 1P60DK079626-01NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK079626NIDDK NIH HHS P60 DK079626NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD008176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost studies among Hispanics have focused on individual risk factors of obesity, with less attention on interpersonal, community and environmental determinants. Conducting community based surveys to study these determinants must ensure representativeness of disparate populations. We describe the use of a novel Geographic Information System (GIS)-based population based sampling to minimize selection bias in a rural community based study.

methodsWe conducted a community based survey to collect and examine social determinants of health and their association with obesity prevalence among a sample of Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites living in a rural community in the Southeastern United States. To ensure a balanced sample of both ethnic groups, we designed an area stratified random sampling procedure involving three stages: (1) division of the sampling area into non-overlapping strata based on Hispanic household proportion using GIS software; (2) random selection of the designated number of Census blocks from each stratum; and (3) random selection of the designated number of housing units (i.e., survey participants) from each Census block.

resultsThe proposed sample included 109 Hispanic and 107 non-Hispanic participants to be recruited from 44 Census blocks. The final sample included 106 Hispanic and 111 non-Hispanic participants. The proportion of Hispanic surveys completed per strata matched our proposed distribution: 7% for strata 1, 30% for strata 2, 58% for strata 3 and 83% for strata 4.

conclusionUtilizing a standardized area based randomized sampling approach allowed us to successfully recruit an ethnically balanced sample while conducting door to door surveys in a rural, community based study. The integration of area based randomized sampling using tools such as GIS in future community-based research should be considered, particularly when trying to reach disparate populations.

Indexed as

CensusesEthnicityHispanic or LatinoHumansSoutheastern United StatesSurveys and QuestionnairesTechnologyArea basedCommunity based methodsGeographic information systemsHispanic populationRural populationStratified random sampling

Identifiers

PMID33167956
PMCPMC7653801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.