Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33167874›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2020

Lyme borreliosis in Finland: a register-based linkage study.

Eeva Feuth, Mikko Virtanen, Otto Helve, Jukka Hytönen, Jussi Sane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eeva FeuthInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20521, Turku, Finland. emsaja@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5094-2384
Mikko VirtanenDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, PO Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Otto HelveDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, PO Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Jukka HytönenInstitute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, FI-20521, Turku, Finland.
Jussi SaneDepartment of Health Security, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, PO Box 30, FI-00271, Helsinki, Finland.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIUniversity of Turku · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Finland, the routine surveillance of Lyme borreliosis (LB) is laboratory-based. In addition, we have well established national health care registers where countrywide data from patient visits in public health care units are collected. In our previous study based on these registers, we reported an increasing incidence of both microbiologically confirmed and clinically diagnosed LB cases in Finland during the past years. Here, we evaluated our register data, refined LB incidence estimates provided in our previous study, and evaluated treatment practices considering LB in the primary health care.

methodsThree national health care registers were used. The Register for Primary Health Care Visits (Avohilmo) and the National Hospital Discharge Register (Hilmo) collect physician-recorded data from the outpatient and inpatient health care visits, respectively, whereas the National Infectious Diseases Register (NIDR) represents positive findings in LB diagnostics notified electronically by microbiological laboratories. We used a personal identification number in register-linkage to identify LB cases on an individual level in the study year 2014. In addition, antibiotic purchase data was retrieved from the Finnish Social Insurance Institution in order to evaluate the LB treatment practices in the primary health care in Finland.

resultsAvohilmo was found to be useful in monitoring clinically diagnosed LB (i.e. erythema migrans (EM) infections), whereas Hilmo did not add much value next to existing laboratory-based surveillance of disseminated LB. However, Hilmo gave valuable information about uncertainties related to physician-based surveillance of disseminated LB and the total annual number of EM infections in our country. Antibiotic purchases associated with the LB-related outpatient visits in the primary health care indicated a good compliance with the recommended treatment guidelines.

conclusionsAvohilmo and laboratory-based NIDR together are useful in monitoring LB incidence in Finland. A good compliance was observed with the recommended treatment guidelines of clinically diagnosed LB in the primary health care. In 2018, Avohilmo was introduced in the routine surveillance of LB in Finland next to laboratory-based surveillance of disseminated LB.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringRegistriesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBorrelia burgdorferiChildChild, PreschoolCommunicable DiseasesErythema Chronicum MigransFemaleFinlandHumansIncidenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsEpidemiologyFinlandLyme borreliosisRegister-based studySurveillance

Identifiers

PMID33167874
PMCPMC7653832
OpenAlexW3106233005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.