ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2020
Gene networks for three feed efficiency criteria reveal shared and specific biological processes.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-wide association studies for feed efficiency, production and feeding behavior traits in Canadian purebred Duroc pigs.Journal of animal science · 2026Article
- An Overview of Advancements in Proteomic Approaches to Enhance Livestock Production and Aquaculture.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- Genetic advancements and future directions in ruminant livestock breeding: from reference genomes to multiomics innovations.Science China. Life sciences · 2025Review
- Residual feed intake in late-laying hens: immune function, metabolic efficiency, and feed utilization dynamics.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Variations in rumen microbiota and host genome impacted feed efficiency in goat breeds.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Transcriptional response to an alternative diet on liver, muscle, and rumen of beef cattle.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Some plasma biomarkers of residual feed intake in beef cattle remain consistent regardless of intake level.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications for cultured meat.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Review
- Genome-wide diversity and admixture of five indigenous cattle populations from the Tigray region of northern Ethiopia.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Shotgun Metagenomic Analyses of Microbial Assemblages in the Aquatic Ecosystem of Winam Gulf of Lake Victoria, Kenya Reveals Multiclass Pollution.BioMed research international · 2023Article
- Genome-Wide Association Study of Feed Efficiency Related Traits in Ducks.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Genomic characterization of the world's longest selection experiment in mouse reveals the complexity of polygenic traits.BMC biology · 2022Article
- A Co-Association Network Analysis Reveals Putative Regulators for Health-Related Traits in Pigs.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFrench beef producers suffer from the decrease in profitability of their farms mainly because of the continuous increase in feed costs. Selection for feed efficiency in beef cattle represents a relevant solution to face this problem. However, feed efficiency is a complex trait that can be assessed by three major criteria: residual feed intake (RFI), residual gain (RG) and feed efficiency ratio (FE), which involve different genetic determinisms. An analysis that combines phenotype and whole-genome sequence data provides a unique framework for genomic studies. The aim of our study was to identify the gene networks and the biological processes that are responsible for the genetic determinism that is shared between these three feed efficiency criteria.
resultsA population of 1477 French Charolais young bulls was phenotyped for feed intake (FI), average daily gain (ADG) and final weight (FW) to estimate RFI, RG and FE. A subset of 789 young bulls was genotyped on the BovineSNP50 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array and imputed at the sequence level using RUN6 of the 1000 Bull Genomes Project. We conducted a genome-wide association study (GWAS) to estimate the individual effect of 8.5 million SNPs and applied an association weight matrix (AWM) approach to analyse the results, one for each feed efficiency criterion. The results highlighted co-association networks including 626 genes for RFI, 426 for RG and 564 for FE. Enrichment assessment revealed the biological processes that show the strongest association with RFI, RG and FE, i.e. digestive tract (salivary, gastric and mucin secretion) and metabolic processes (cellular and cardiovascular). Energetic functions were more associated with RFI and FE and cardio-vascular and cellular processes with RG. Several hormones such as apelin, glucagon, insulin, aldosterone, the gonadotrophin releasing hormone and the thyroid hormone were also identified, and these should be tested in future studies as candidate biomarkers for feed efficiency.
conclusionsThe combination of network and pathway analyses at the sequence level led to the identification of both common and specific mechanisms that are involved in RFI, RG and FE, and to a better understanding of the genetic determinism underlying these three criteria. The effects of the genes involved in each of the identified processes need to be tested in genomic evaluations to confirm the potential gain in reliability of using functional variants to select animals for feed efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.