Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33167869›Full record

ArticleThe journal of headache and pain2020

Burden of illness of trigeminal neuralgia among patients managed in a specialist center in England.

Lasair O'Callaghan, Lysbeth Floden, Lisa Vinikoor-Imler, Tara Symonds, Kathryn Giblin, Chris Hartford, Joanna M Zakrzewska

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of headache and pain, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Molecular Basis and Pathophysiology of Trigeminal Neuralgia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Trigeminal neuralgia: a practical guide.Practical neurology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lasair O'CallaghanBiogen, 225 Binney St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA. lasair.ocallaghan@biogen.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4643-1557
Lysbeth FlodenClinical Outcomes Solutions, 1820 E. River Rd., Suite 220, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.
Lisa Vinikoor-ImlerBiogen, 225 Binney St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Tara SymondsClinical Outcomes Solutions, Unit 68, Basepoint, Shearway Road, Shearway Business Park, Folkestone, Kent, CT19 4RH, UK.
Kathryn GiblinFormerly Biogen, 225 Binney St, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA.
Chris HartfordClinical Outcomes Solutions, 1820 E. River Rd., Suite 220, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.
Joanna M ZakrzewskaRoyal National ENT & Eastman Dental Hospitals, 4th Floor Central, 250 Euston Road, London, NW1 2PQ, UK.
Biogen (United States) · USHealth Outcomes Solutions (United States) · USUCL Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTrigeminal neuralgia (TN) causes severe episodic, unilateral facial pain and is initially treated with antiepileptic medications. For patients not responding or intolerant to medications, surgery is an option.

methodsIn order to expand understanding of the pain-related burden of illness associated with TN, a cross-sectional survey was conducted of patients at a specialist center that utilizes a multidisciplinary care pathway. Participants provided information regarding their pain experience and treatment history, and completed several patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.

resultsOf 129 respondents, 69/128 (54%; 1 missing) reported no pain in the past 4 weeks. However, 84 (65%) respondents were on medications, including 49 (38%) on monotherapy and 35 (27%) on polytherapy. A proportion of patients had discontinued at least one medication in the past, mostly due to lack of efficacy (n = 62, 48%) and side effects (n = 51, 40%). A total of 52 (40%) patients had undergone surgery, of whom 30 had microvascular decompression (MVD). Although surgery, especially MVD, provided satisfactory pain control in many patients, 29% of post-surgical patients reported complications, 19% had pain worsen or stay the same, 48% were still taking pain medications for TN, and 33% reported new and different facial pain.

conclusionsIn most PRO measures, respondents with current pain interference had poorer scores than those without pain interference. In the Patient Global Impression of Change, 79% expressed improvement since beginning of treatment at this clinic. These results indicate that while the multidisciplinary approach can substantially alleviate the impact of TN, there remains an unmet medical need for additional treatment options.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesEnglandFacial PainFemaleHumansMaleMicrovascular Decompression SurgeryMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementPostoperative ComplicationsTreatment OutcomeTrigeminal NeuralgiaFacial painMicrovascular decompressionMultidisciplinary approachPatient related outcomesTrigeminal nerveTrigeminal neuralgia

Identifiers

PMID33167869
PMCPMC7653862
OpenAlexW3105184507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.