Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33167713›Full record

ArticleClinical EEG and neuroscience2021

Sensory Filtering and Sensory Memory in Breast Cancer Survivors.

Robert D Melara, James C Root, Raquel Bibi, Tim A Ahles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Effects of Breast Cancer Treatment on Neural Noise: a Longitudinal Design.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Longitudinal Effects of Breast Cancer Treatment on Neural Correlates of Attention.Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert D MelaraDepartment of Psychology, City College, 14770City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9859-3312
James C RootDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 5803Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Raquel BibiDepartment of Psychology, City College, 14770City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Tim A AhlesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 5803Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Training and Career Development CoreU54CA132378 · NCI · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI Tim Alan Ahles, ADRIANA ESPINOSA · 2008 to 2026
$28.9M
Training and Career Development and Education CoreU54CA137788 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI Daniel Alan Heller · 2008 to 2026
$28.1M
OLDER BREAST CANCER PATIENTS: RISK FOR COGNITIVE DECLINER01CA129769 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI AHLES, TIM ALAN, MANDELBLATT, JEANNE · 2009 to 2020
$7.3M
Assessment of sensory gating, attention, and executive control in breast cancerR01CA218496 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI AHLES, TIM ALAN, ROOT, JAMES C · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
Cognition In Older Breast Cancer Survivors: Treatment Exposure, APOE, & SmokingR01CA172119 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI AHLES, TIM ALAN, HURRIA, ARTI · 2013 to 2017
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129769NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172119NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218496NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132378NCI NIH HHS U54 CA137788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Survivors of breast and other cancers often report protracted difficulty in performing tasks involving concentration and memory, even years after the completion of treatment. The current study investigated whether cancer and treatment history is associated with deficits in sensory filtering (gating out) and sensory memory (gating in), early processes in stimulus processing that may contribute to difficulties in later remembering. A group of breast cancer survivors and age-matched healthy control participants (mean age 54 years) underwent testing with paired-click and oddball tasks while electroencephalographic (EEG) signals were recorded. The survivors showed relatively poor inhibition of redundant sensory stimulation (P50 suppression). Dipole source analysis localized the survivors' impairment to the hippocampus, with preservation of function in gating mechanisms of the frontal lobe and auditory cortex. Survivors also showed disruption to sensory memory processes needed to register novel information in an otherwise uniform auditory environment (mismatch negativity). The findings suggest that survivors experience deficits in early, automatic mechanisms of sensory gating, which may trigger a cascade of later perceived attentional and memory deficits. If our account is accurate, ideal therapies might aim to restore early inhibitory processes, such as those gauged by P50 suppression.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsAcoustic StimulationElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, AuditoryHumansMiddle AgedSensory GatingSurvivorscancer survivorsdipole source analysiselectroencephalographymismatch negativityP50 suppressionsensory gatingsensory memory

Identifiers

PMID33167713
PMCPMC9152732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.