Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33167492›Full record

ReviewToxins2020

The

Nadja Jessberger, Richard Dietrich, Per Einar Granum, Erwin Märtlbauer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Toxins, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 69 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 152 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Virulence · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mixed Fermentation UsingFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Pathogenesis of human-derivedFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Differentiation ofBio-protocol · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Nadja JessbergerDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Schönleutnerstr. 8, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Richard DietrichDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Schönleutnerstr. 8, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany.
Per Einar GranumDepartment of Food Safety and Infection Biology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003 NMBU, 1432 Ås, Norway.
Erwin MärtlbauerDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Schönleutnerstr. 8, 85764 Oberschleißheim, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3390-8173
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DENorwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft JE 871/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquitous soil bacterium

Indexed as

Bacillus cereusDysenteryEnterotoxinsFoodborne DiseasesFood MicrobiologyFood SupplyGastrointestinal TractGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsSoil MicrobiologyVirulenceenterotoxin, Bacillus cereusEnterotoxinsadhesionBacillus cereusenterotoxinsfood poisoningmotilityoutbreaksrisk evaluationsporestoxico-infection

Identifiers

PMID33167492
PMCPMC7694497
OpenAlexW3097277419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.