Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33167475›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Psychometric Assessment of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16) for Arabic/French-Speaking Migrants in Southern Europe.

Pilar Bas-Sarmiento, Miriam Poza-Méndez, Martina Fernández-Gutiérrez, Juan Luis González-Caballero, María Falcón Romero

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Network Analysis of the HLSJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Portuguese Version of the HLS-EU-Q6 and HLS-EU-Q16 Questionnaire: Psychometric Properties.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pilar Bas-SarmientoDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University Institute of Research in Social Sustainable Development (INDESS), University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6309-4997
Miriam Poza-MéndezDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, University of Cadiz, 11207 Cadiz, Spain.
Martina Fernández-GutiérrezDepartment of Nursing and Physiotherapy, University Institute of Research in Social Sustainable Development (INDESS), University of Cadiz, 11009 Cadiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3961-2250
Juan Luis González-CaballeroDepartment of Statistics and Operational Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Cadiz, 11003 Cadiz, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3378-5038
María Falcón RomeroDepartment of Socio-Sanitary Sciences, University of Murcia, 30100 Murcia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving health literacy (HL) is critical for addressing health inequalities. Low literacy rates are believed to be more prevalent in ethnic minorities, which may have an impact on people's health. For measures to be implemented in this regard, HL must be evaluated to obtain specific indicators. Our aim, therefore, was to develop a version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q16), which is recommended to be used with vulnerable populations, suited to Arabic/French-speaking migrants who reside in south-eastern Spain, and to explore its psychometric properties for assessing health literacy in this population. A cross-sectional survey was carried out in a convenient sample of 205 migrants. The structural validity was calculated by a confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA), which suggested appropriate adjustment indicators, and which indicated that the three-dimensional model is adequately adjusted to the data obtained in the study. The coefficient omega showed high internal consistency in the three HL dimensions (health care, disease prevention, and health promotion). Concurrent validity presented a significant correlation with the Newest Vital Sign test (r = 0.390;

Indexed as

Health LiteracyPsychometricsTransients and MigrantsCross-Sectional StudiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleReproducibility of ResultsSpainSurveys and Questionnaireshealth literacymigrantspsychometricsreliability and validitysurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33167475
PMCPMC7663905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.