Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33167444›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Subtask Segmentation of Timed Up and Go Test for Mobility Assessment of Perioperative Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Chia-Yeh Hsieh, Hsiang-Yun Huang, Kai-Chun Liu, Kun-Hui Chen, Steen Jun-Ping Hsu, Chia-Tai Chan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07367789 (Prediction of Patient-reported Outcome Measure and Performance-based Measure After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Instrumented Insoles and Deep Neural Networks), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07367789 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Prediction of Patient-reported Outcome Measure and Performance-based Measure After Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Instrumented Insoles and Deep Neural Networks

TypeobservationalSponsorYonsei UniversityRan2021 to 2026Enrolled200ConditionsKnee Osteoarthritis, Total Knee ArthroplastyArmsInstrumented Insole Gait Assessment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chia-Yeh HsiehDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6771-2067
Hsiang-Yun HuangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2319-1204
Kai-Chun LiuResearch Center for Information Technology Innovation, Academia Sinica, Taipei 11529, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-7867-4716
Kun-Hui ChenDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.
Steen Jun-Ping HsuDepartment of Information Management, Minghsin University of Science and Technology, Hsinchu 30401, Taiwan.
Chia-Tai ChanDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei 11221, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-0995-601X
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWMinghsin University of Science and Technology · TWResearch Center for Information Technology Innovation, Academia Sinica · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 109-2221-E-010-005-
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common treatments for people with severe knee osteoarthritis (OA). The accuracy of outcome measurements and quantitative assessments for perioperative TKA is an important issue in clinical practice. Timed up and go (TUG) tests have been validated to measure basic mobility and balance capabilities. A TUG test contains a series of subtasks, including sit-to-stand, walking-out, turning, walking-in, turning around, and stand-to-sit tasks. Detailed information about subtasks is essential to aid clinical professionals and physiotherapists in making assessment decisions. The main objective of this study is to design and develop a subtask segmentation approach using machine-learning models and knowledge-based postprocessing during the TUG test for perioperative TKA. The experiment recruited 26 patients with severe knee OA (11 patients with bilateral TKA planned and 15 patients with unilateral TKA planned). A series of signal-processing mechanisms and pattern recognition approaches involving machine learning-based multi-classifiers, fragmentation modification and subtask inference are designed and developed to tackle technical challenges in typical classification algorithms, including motion variability, fragmentation and ambiguity. The experimental results reveal that the accuracy of the proposed subtask segmentation approach using the AdaBoost technique with a window size of 128 samples is 92%, which is an improvement of at least 15% compared to that of the typical subtask segmentation approach using machine-learning models only.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeExercise TestOsteoarthritis, KneeHumansMachine LearningPostural BalanceTime and Motion StudiesWalkingperioperative total knee arthroplastysubtask segmentationtimed up and go (TUG) testwearable sensor

Identifiers

PMID33167444
PMCPMC7663910
OpenAlexW3095669007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.