Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33167417›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Why Do Some Spanish Nursing Students with Menstrual Pain Fail to Consult Healthcare Professionals?

Juan Diego Ramos-Pichardo, Ángela María Ortega-Galán, María Teresa Iglesias-López, Ana Abreu-Sánchez, Elia Fernández-Martínez

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06233786 (Effectiveness of Non-invasive Neuromodulation in Primary Dysmenhorrea), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06233786 phase3unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of Non-invasive Neuromodulation in Primary Dysmenhorrea: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNaiara Benítez AramburuRan2024 to 2024Enrolled30ConditionsPrimary DysmenorrheaArmsTranscutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Efficacy of Physiotherapy Treatment in Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Menstruation myths.Nature human behaviour · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effect of Lumbar Spine Mobility and Postural Alignment on Menstrual Pain in Young Women.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Nursing Students' Perceptions of Menstrual Distress during Clinical Practice: A Q-Methodology Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Juan Diego Ramos-PichardoDepartment of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6207-8490
Ángela María Ortega-GalánDepartment of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain.
María Teresa Iglesias-LópezFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Crta. Pozuelo-Majadahonda km 1800, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4511-5592
Ana Abreu-SánchezDepartment of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1240-4611
Elia Fernández-MartínezDepartment of Nursing, University of Huelva, 21071 Huelva, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7700-999X
Universidad de Huelva · ESUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dysmenorrhea is a problem that affects a large percentage of young women worldwide. Alarmingly, the majority of these women choose to self-medicate rather than consult a healthcare professional, despite the risks involved. The present study aimed to explore the reasons why undergraduate nursing students do not consult health care professionals regarding their menstrual pain. A qualitative study was conducted using an open question: "Why didn't you consult a healthcare professional?" within the context of a research project on primary dysmenorrhea among nursing students at the University of Huelva, Spain. The responses of 202 women were analyzed using content analysis. Three categories were identified: assessment of the pain experienced, expectations, and experiences of professional care and selfcare. We found a striking normalization of the problem; notably, students downplayed the importance of the problem, considering that it was not worth consulting a physician. Furthermore, there was a notable degree of self-medication using non-steroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAIDs). These results may be useful for orienting policies to raise social awareness of this problem and for designing health education strategies aimed at women with primary dysmenorrhea.

Indexed as

Education, Nursing, BaccalaureateStudents, NursingDelivery of Health CareDysmenorrheaFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansSpaindysmenorrheamenstrual painpain managementqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID33167417
PMCPMC7663954
OpenAlexW3095299387

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.