ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2020
Blindness following bilateral neck dissection. A case report and review of the literature.
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Amaurosis Post-Bilateral Neck Dissection: A Systematic Review.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- Suspected cavernous sinus thrombosis and blindness after lumbar spine surgery: A rare case report and literature review.International journal of surgery case reports · 2024Article
- Oncological Outcome of Node-Positive Oral Squamous Cell Carcinomas Treated With Selective and Comprehensive Neck Dissection.BioMed research international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVisual loss is a very rare but dramatic complication of such an indispensable standard procedure in head and neck tumor surgery such as the cervical lymphadenectomy (neck dissection). PRESENTATION OF CASE: We present a review of the literature and a new case of a postoperative blindness of a 65-year-old man with type 2 diabetes who underwent a unilateral radical neck dissection, a contralateral modified radical neck dissection and a hemimandibulectomy for an oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. DISCUSSION: By now there have been only 15 clinical cases of total blindness published during the last 60 years. In 13 cases blindness followed a bilateral radical neck dissection whereas in 2 cases blindness occurred after a combined selective and modified radical neck dissection. Ischemia of the optic nerve due to intraoperative hypotension, blood loss and venous congestion were the major etiological aspects of blindness. Perioperative management of differentiated volume and blood administration, blood pressure management and a close postoperative ophthalmological check seem to be of a major importance for prevention and early detection of visual deterioration. Nevertheless, there are no clear predicative factors for blindness after neck dissection and the prognosis is unfavorable.
conclusionEven though postoperative vision loss is a rare and devastating complication, this current case and the review of the literature show that it occurs every once in a while following standard operations to the head and neck. Patients undergoing high-risk procedures should have to be informed that there is a slight risk of perioperative vision loss and this should be highlighted in the standard declaration of consent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.