Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33166799›Full record

ArticlePsychoneuroendocrinology2020

Endotoxemia coupled with heightened inflammation predicts future depressive symptoms.

Annelise A Madison, Rebecca Andridge, Avelina C Padin, Stephanie Wilson, Michael T Bailey, Catherine M Alfano, Stephen P Povoski, Adele M Lipari, Doreen M Agnese, William E Carson and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychoneuroendocrinology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. The gut microbiota and nervous system: Age-defined and age-defying.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Annelise A MadisonInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States; Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, United States.
Rebecca AndridgeInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States; College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, United States.
Avelina C PadinInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States; Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, United States.
Stephanie WilsonDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, United States.
Michael T BaileyInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States; Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States; Center for Microbial Pathogenesis, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, United States.
Catherine M AlfanoNorthwell Health Cancer Institute, United States.
Stephen P PovoskiComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, United States.
Adele M LipariComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, United States.
Doreen M AgneseComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, United States.
William E CarsonComprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, United States.
William B MalarkeyInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States.
Janice K Kiecolt-GlaserInstitute for Behavioral Medicine Research, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: Janice.Kiecolt-Glaser@osumc.edu.
The Ohio State University · USInstitute for Behavioral Medicine · USNorthwell Health · USSouthern Methodist University · US

Funding

The Ohio State University Center for clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR001070 · NCATS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, REBECCA D · 2013 to 2017
$22.6M
Breast Cancer Survivors Cardiovascular Risks: Treatment and Behavioral InfluencesR01CA186720 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KIECOLT-GLASER, JANICE · 2014 to 2018
$4.6M
Fatigue, Depression, and Inflammation in Cancer Survivors: A Prospective StudyR01CA131029 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KIECOLT-GLASER, JANICE · 2008 to 2013
$4.1M
Biobehavioral Influences on Cancer: Perspectives from PsychoneuroimmunologyK05CA172296 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KIECOLT-GLASER, JANICE · 2013 to 2017
$426k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001070NCI NIH HHS K05 CA172296NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131029NCI NIH HHS R01 CA186720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCross-sectional data have linked gut barrier abnormalities and endotoxemia with depression, even among those without gastrointestinal symptoms. This study examined longitudinal associations between endotoxemia markers and depressive symptoms, as well as the role of inflammation in this relationship.

designAt three annual visits, 315 women (n=209 breast cancer survivors, n = 106 non-cancer patient controls, M=55 years old) completed the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression questionnaire (CES-D) and provided blood samples to assess inflammatory markers - interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and C-reactive protein - and endotoxemia markers - lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP), soluble CD14 (sCD14), and their ratio.

resultsAdjusting for key demographic variables, health behaviors, visit 1 depressive symptoms, and cancer status and treatment, women with higher visit 1 LBP and LBP/sCD14 had more depressive symptoms at the two subsequent annual visits. Illustrating the notable impact, a woman at the 75th percentile for LBP or LBP/sCD14 at visit 1 was 18 % more likely to report clinically significant depressive symptoms (CES-D ≥16) at follow-up than a woman in the lowest quartile. Cancer status and treatment type did not modulate this relationship. In contrast, visit 1 depressive symptoms did not predict endotoxemia at follow-up. A significant interaction between LBP/sCD14 and inflammatory burden suggested that visit 1 endotoxemia fueled depressive symptoms only in the context of elevated inflammation.

conclusionThese results suggest that endotoxemia, combined with systemic inflammation, can drive depressive symptoms. These findings may implicate bacterial endotoxin translocation from the gut to the bloodstream in depression etiology. Interventions that reduce endotoxemia and inflammation may lessen the risk of depression.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionEndotoxemiaFemaleHumansInflammationInterleukin-6Lipopolysaccharide ReceptorsLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedPrognosisTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaBiomarkersC-Reactive ProteinInterleukin-6Lipopolysaccharide ReceptorsTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaCancerDepressive symptomsEndotoxemiaLipopolysaccharide binding proteinsCD14

Identifiers

PMID33166799
PMCPMC7721058
OpenAlexW3092117965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.