Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33166583›Full record

Trial reportJournal of pain and symptom management2021

Perceived Benefits and Burdens of Participation for Caregivers of Cancer Patients in Hospice Clinical Trials: A Pilot Study.

Debra Parker Oliver, Jacquelyn J Benson, Connie Ulrich, Karla T Washington, Abigail J Rolbiecki, Patrick White, Jamie B Smith, Christina Lero, Olivia J Landon, George Demiris

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Benefits and Burdens of Research Participation: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review in Palliative and End-of-Life Care.Journal of hospice and palliative nursing : JHPN : the official journal of the Hospice and Palliative Nurses Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Time to publication for results of clinical trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Debra Parker OliverDivision of Palliative Medicine, Barnes Jewish College, Goldfarb School of Nursing, Washington University St Louis, Columbia, Missouri, USA. Electronic address: oliverd@wustl.edu.
Jacquelyn J BensonDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Connie UlrichDepartment of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Karla T WashingtonDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Abigail J RolbieckiDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Patrick WhiteDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Stokes Family Endowed Chair in Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA.
Jamie B SmithDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Christina LeroDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Olivia J LandonDepartment of Human Development and Family Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
George DemirisDepartment of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

ACCESS_Access for Cancer Caregivers to Education and Support for Shared decisionmakingR01CA203999 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PARKER OLIVER, DEBRA · 2017 to 2021
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA203999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextHospice is a service for those with a life expectancy of six months or less. Family caregivers suffer from depression and anxiety as they care for their loved one until they die. Little is known about how research participants decide to consent to participate in clinical trials in the hospice setting.

objectivesThis pilot study sought to answer two research questions: 1) In what way do demographic characteristics, mental health, and perceived caregiving experience impact the decision by caregivers to participate in hospice clinical trials? 2) In what ways do the perceived physical, psychological, economic, familial, and social dimensions of caregivers' lives influence their decision to participate in hospice clinical trials?

methodsThe characteristics and stated reasons for consent of hospice caregivers participating in a clinical trial were compared with individuals who refused clinical trial consent and only consented to this pilot study. Demographic, mental health, and perceptions of caregiving experience were measured as influencers to the consent decision. Recruitment calls were recorded and coded using framework analysis to identify perceived benefits and burdens impacting the decision to consent to the clinical trial.

resultsOverall, trial participants were more often adult children to the patient (55% vs. 21%, P = 0.005), younger (56 vs. 63 years, P = 0.04), and employed (47% vs. 24%, P = 0.02) as compared with those who did not consent to participate in the trial. Reported levels of depression, anxiety, and quality of life were not significantly different between those who chose to participate in the clinical trial and those who participated only in this pilot study; however, caregiver burden was higher for those consenting to the clinical trial (4.05 vs. 7.16, P < 0.0001). Perceived benefits expressed by both groups were largely psychological as participants felt positive about contributing to science. Burdens expressed by both groups were predominately physical as they related to hesitation to participate in the intervention because of technology or the burdens of caregiving.

conclusionThe benefits and burdens model for clinical trial participation is applicable to the caregiver experience in the hospice setting. Understanding the perceptions and dimensions of benefits and burdens to potential study participants is critical to not only the intervention design but also the tailoring of recruitment contacts and informed consent process.

Indexed as

Hospice CareHospicesNeoplasmsCaregiversHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsQuality of Lifecaregiversclinical trialHospiceparticipationrecruitmentresearch

Identifiers

PMID33166583
PMCPMC8552226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.