Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33166568›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2021

Juvenile stress facilitates safety learning in male and female high alcohol preferring mice.

Iris Müller, Demitra D Adams, Susan Sangha, Julia A Chester

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iris MüllerDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: irismueller1985@gmail.com.
Demitra D AdamsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: demitra.adams@yahoo.com.
Susan SanghaDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: sangha@purdue.edu.
Julia A ChesterDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA; Purdue Institute for Integrative Neuroscience, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA. Electronic address: jcheste@purdue.edu.
Purdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Rodents with Genetic Differences in Alcohol PreferenceR24AA015512 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI BELL, RICHARD LOWELL · 2005 to 2014
$5.1M
Neural circuitry of safety, fear and reward cue discriminationR01MH110425 · NIMH · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI Susan Sangha · 2018 to 2026
$3.8M
Rodents with Genetic Differences in Alcohol PreferenceU24AA015512 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI BELL, RICHARD LOWELL · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NIAAA NIH HHS R24 AA015512NIAAA NIH HHS U24 AA015512NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH110425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adversities during juvenility increase the risk for stress-related disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and alcohol use disorder. However, stress can also induce coping mechanisms beneficial for later stressful experiences. We reported previously that mice selectively bred for high alcohol preference (HAP) exposed to stress during adolescence (but not during adulthood) showed enhanced fear-conditioned responses in adulthood, as measured by fear-potentiated startle (FPS). However, HAP mice also showed enhanced responding to safety cues predicting the absence of foot shocks in adulthood. Here, we pursue these findings in HAP mice by investigating in further detail how juvenile stress impacts the acquisition of safety and fear learning. HAP mice were subjected to three days of juvenile stress (postnatal days 25, 27, 28) and discriminative safety/fear conditioning in adulthood. FPS was used to assess safety versus fear cue discrimination, fear learning, and fear inhibition by the safety cue. Both stressed and unstressed HAP mice were able to discriminate between both cues as well as learn the fear cue-shock association. Interestingly, it was only the previously stressed mice that were able to inhibit their fear response when the fear cue was co-presented with the safety cue, thus demonstrating safety learning. We also report an incidental finding of alopecia in the juvenile stress groups, a phenotype seen in stress-related disorders. These results in HAP mice may be relevant to understanding the influence of juvenile trauma for individual risk and resilience toward developing PTSD and how individuals might benefit from safety cues in behavioral psychotherapy.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAlcoholismAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalCuesDisease Models, AnimalFearFemaleMaleMiceReflex, StartleStress, PsychologicalFear conditioningFear-potentiated startleJuvenile stressPTSDResilienceSafety learning

Identifiers

PMID33166568
PMCPMC7855736
OpenAlexW3096984688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.