Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33166484›Full record

ArticlePublic health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974)

Alignment of State Regulations With Breastfeeding and Beverage Best Practices for Childcare Centers and Family Childcare Homes, United States.

Danielle L Lee, Raquel Traseira, Sophia Navarro, Natasha Frost, Sara E Benjamin-Neelon, Angie L Cradock, Ken Hecht, Lorrene D Ritchie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health reports (Washington, D.C. : 1974). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Danielle L Lee115144 Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2138-1087
Raquel Traseira115144 Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA, USA.
Sophia Navarro115144 Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA, USA.
Natasha Frost33816 Public Health Law Center, Mitchell Hamline School of Law, St Paul, MN, USA.
Sara E Benjamin-Neelon25802 Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Angie L Cradock1812 Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Ken Hecht115144 Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA, USA.
Lorrene D Ritchie115144 Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland, CA, USA.

Funding

STIMULUS - Science & Technology Immersion for Underrepresented Learners in the U.S.R25HL125451 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI FUNG, ELLEN B, TREADWELL, MARSHA J · 2015 to 2024
$1.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R25 HL125451
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesChildcare is an important setting for nutrition; nearly half of young children in the United States participate in licensed childcare, where they consume up to two-thirds of their daily dietary intake. We compared state regulations for childcare with best practices to support breastfeeding and healthy beverage provision.

methodsWe reviewed regulations for childcare centers (centers) and family childcare homes (homes) in effect May-July 2016 and rated all 50 states for inclusion (1 = not included, 2 = partially included, 3 = fully included) of 12 breastfeeding and beverage best practices. We calculated average ratings for 6 practices specific to infants aged 0-11 months, 6 practices specific to children aged 1-6 years, and all 12 practices, by state and across all states. We assessed significant differences between centers and homes for each best practice by using McNemar-Bowker tests for symmetry, and we assessed differences across states by using paired student

resultsStates included best practices in regulations for centers more often than for homes. Average ratings (standard deviations) in regulations across all states were significantly higher in centers than in homes for infant best practices (2.1 [0.5] vs 1.8 [0.5],

conclusionsAlthough best practices were more consistently included in regulations for centers than for homes, many state childcare regulations did not include best practices to support breastfeeding and the provision of healthy beverages. Findings can be used to inform efforts to improve regulations and to reduce differences between centers and homes.

Indexed as

BeveragesBreast FeedingPractice Guidelines as TopicChild CareChild Day Care CentersChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesGovernment RegulationHumansInfantNutrition PolicyState GovernmentUnited Statesbeveragesbreastfeedinginfantnutrition policypreschool

Identifiers

PMID33166484
PMCPMC7856380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.