ArticlePloS one2020
Investigating hospital Mycobacterium chelonae infection using whole genome sequencing and hybrid assembly.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revisiting bioluminescence and sucrose utilization in aquatic pathogens Vibrio harveyi and V. campbellii using genome-wide in silico mapping and phenotyping.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prevalence of resistance to macrolides and aminoglycosides in Mycobacterium avium, M. abscessus, and M. chelonae identified in the Laboratorio Nacional de Referencia of Colombia from 2018 to 2022Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2024Article
- Infrequent intrahousehold transmission of Clostridioides difficile between pet owners and their pets.Zoonoses and public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Hybrid Assembly Provides Improved Resolution of Plasmids, Antimicrobial Resistance Genes, and Virulence Factors inMicroorganisms · 2021Article
- Evaluating the potential for respiratory metagenomics to improve treatment of secondary infection and detection of nosocomial transmission on expanded COVID-19 intensive care units.Genome medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mycobacterium chelonae is a rapidly growing nontuberculous mycobacterium that is a common cause of nosocomial infections. Here we describe investigation of a possible nosocomial transmission of M. chelonae at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (HUP). M. chelonae strains with similar high-level antibiotic resistance patterns were isolated from two patients who developed post-operative infections at HUP in 2017, suggesting a possible point source infection. The isolates, along with other clinical isolates from other patients, were sequenced using the Illumina and Oxford Nanopore technologies. The resulting short and long reads were hybrid assembled into draft genomes. The genomes were compared by quantifying single nucleotide variants in the core genome and assessed using a control dataset to quantify error rates in comparisons of identical genomes. We show that all M. chelonae isolates tested were highly dissimilar, as indicated by high pairwise SNV values, consistent with environmental acquisition and not a nosocomial point source. Our control dataset determined a threshold for evaluating identity between strains while controlling for sequencing error. Finally, antibiotic resistance genes were predicted for our isolates, and several single nucleotide variants were identified that have the potential to modulated drug resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.