ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2020
Reimagining T Staging Through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Image Processing Approaches in Digital Pathology.
Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of artificial intelligence and radiomics in the prediction of lymph node metastasis and tumour grading of oral cancer - a systematic review and meta analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis and histopathological grading of bladder cancer: current status, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
- Biological feature-based machine learning in histopathological images: a systematic review.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Prediction of neoadjuvant therapy response in breast cancer based on interpretable artificial intelligence.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2026Article
- Progress of MRI-based radiomics and deep learning for predicting the prognosis of locally advanced rectal cancer (Review).Oncology letters · 2025Review
- Graph-based analysis of histopathological images for lung cancer classification using GLCM features and enhanced graph.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- An integrated method for detecting lung cancer via CT scanning via optimization, deep learning, and IoT data transmission.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in the Field of Artificial Intelligence for Precision Medicine in Patients with a Diagnosis of Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Artificial intelligence to predict outcomes of head and neck radiotherapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023Article
- Review
- History of the SPIE Medical Imaging Digital Pathology Conference.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022Review
- Integration of artificial intelligence and precision oncology in Latin America.Frontiers in medical technology · 2022Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology: What Is the Future?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology: What Is the Future?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor stage and grade, visually assessed by pathologists from evaluation of pathology images in conjunction with radiographic imaging techniques, have been linked to outcome, progression, and survival for a number of cancers. The gold standard of staging in oncology has been the TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) staging system. Though histopathological grading has shown prognostic significance, it is subjective and limited by interobserver variability even among experienced surgical pathologists. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) approaches have been applied to pathology images toward diagnostic-, prognostic-, and treatment prediction-related tasks in cancer. AI approaches have the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional TNM staging and tumor grading approaches, providing a direct prognostic prediction of disease outcome independent of tumor stage and grade. Broadly speaking, these AI approaches involve extracting patterns from images that are then compared against previously defined disease signatures. These patterns are typically categorized as either (1) handcrafted, which involve domain-inspired attributes, such as nuclear shape, or (2) deep learning (DL)-based representations, which tend to be more abstract. DL approaches have particularly gained considerable popularity because of the minimal domain knowledge needed for training, mostly only requiring annotated examples corresponding to the categories of interest. In this article, we discuss AI approaches for digital pathology, especially as they relate to disease prognosis, prediction of genomic and molecular alterations in the tumor, and prediction of treatment response in oncology. We also discuss some of the potential challenges with validation, interpretability, and reimbursement that must be addressed before widespread clinical deployment. The article concludes with a brief discussion of potential future opportunities in the field of AI for digital pathology and oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.