Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33166198›Full record

ArticleJCO clinical cancer informatics2020

Reimagining T Staging Through Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Image Processing Approaches in Digital Pathology.

Kaustav Bera, Ian Katz, Anant Madabhushi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCO clinical cancer informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Artificial intelligence to predict outcomes of head and neck radiotherapy.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. History of the SPIE Medical Imaging Digital Pathology Conference.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaustav BeraCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0001-9831-6000
Ian KatzSouthern Sun Pathology, Sydney, Australia, and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Anant MadabhushiCase Western Reserve University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0000-0002-5741-0399

Funding

Computerized histologic image predictor of cancer outcomeR01CA202752 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI FELDMAN, MICHAEL D, GANESAN, SHRIDAR · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Quantitative Histomorphometric Risk Classifier (QuHbIC) in HPV + Oropharyngeal CarcinomaR01CA220581 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KOYFMAN, SHLOMO, LEWIS, JAMES · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
Computerized Histologic Risk Predictor (CHiRP) for Early Stage Lung CancersR01CA216579 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI FU, PINGFU, LLOYD, MARK · 2018 to 2023
$3.1M
MR Fingerprinting and Computerized Decision Support for Prostate CancerR01CA208236 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI GULANI, VIKAS, PONSKY, LEE EVAN · 2017 to 2022
$3.0M
Pathology Image Informatics Platform for visualization, analysis and managementU24CA199374 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GURCAN, METIN NAFI, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
HistoTools: A suite of digital pathology tools for quality control, annotation and dataset identificationU01CA239055 · NCI · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI JANOWCZYK, ANDREW ROBERT, MADABHUSHI, ANANT · 2019 to 2022
$1.0M
A Study to Validate and Improve an Automated Image Analysis Algorithm to Detect Tuberculosis in Sputum Smear SlidesR43EB028736 · NIBIB · DIASCOPIC, LLC · PI MADABHUSHI, ANANT, SERIF, CARY · 2019 to 2019
$225k
RadIO: A Novel Radiomics Toolkit to Predict and Characterize Response to Immunotherapy in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung CancerI01BX004121 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI Anant Madabhushi, Charles J Nock · 2019 to 2026
–
BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH FACILITIESC06RR012463 · NCRR · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI KUTINA, KENNETH L · 1997 to 1997
–
BLRD VA I01 BX004121NCI NIH HHS R01 CA202752NCI NIH HHS R01 CA208236NCI NIH HHS R01 CA216579NCI NIH HHS R01 CA220581NCI NIH HHS U01 CA239055NCI NIH HHS U24 CA199374NCRR NIH HHS C06 RR012463NIBIB NIH HHS R43 EB028736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor stage and grade, visually assessed by pathologists from evaluation of pathology images in conjunction with radiographic imaging techniques, have been linked to outcome, progression, and survival for a number of cancers. The gold standard of staging in oncology has been the TNM (tumor-node-metastasis) staging system. Though histopathological grading has shown prognostic significance, it is subjective and limited by interobserver variability even among experienced surgical pathologists. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) approaches have been applied to pathology images toward diagnostic-, prognostic-, and treatment prediction-related tasks in cancer. AI approaches have the potential to overcome the limitations of conventional TNM staging and tumor grading approaches, providing a direct prognostic prediction of disease outcome independent of tumor stage and grade. Broadly speaking, these AI approaches involve extracting patterns from images that are then compared against previously defined disease signatures. These patterns are typically categorized as either (1) handcrafted, which involve domain-inspired attributes, such as nuclear shape, or (2) deep learning (DL)-based representations, which tend to be more abstract. DL approaches have particularly gained considerable popularity because of the minimal domain knowledge needed for training, mostly only requiring annotated examples corresponding to the categories of interest. In this article, we discuss AI approaches for digital pathology, especially as they relate to disease prognosis, prediction of genomic and molecular alterations in the tumor, and prediction of treatment response in oncology. We also discuss some of the potential challenges with validation, interpretability, and reimbursement that must be addressed before widespread clinical deployment. The article concludes with a brief discussion of potential future opportunities in the field of AI for digital pathology and oncology.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMedical OncologyNeoplasm Grading

Identifiers

PMID33166198
PMCPMC7713520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.