Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165958›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesia2020

Project for Universal Management of Airways - part 1: concept and methods.

N Chrimes, A Higgs, J A Law, P A Baker, R M Cooper, R Greif, G Kovacs, S N Myatra, E P O'Sullivan, W H Rosenblatt and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Recent advances in airway management.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 13 institutions in 10 countries.

N ChrimesDepartment of Anaesthesia, Monash Medical Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
A HiggsDepartment of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Warrington Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheshire, UK.
J A LawDepartment of Anesthesia, Pain Management and Peri-operative Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
P A BakerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
R M CooperDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
R GreifDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.
G KovacsDepartments of Emergency Medicine, Anesthesia, Medical Neurosciences and Division of Medical Education, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
S N MyatraDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India.
E P O'SullivanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
W H RosenblattDepartment of Anesthesia, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
C H RossDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Mercy Health, Javon Bea Hospital, Rockton and Riverside Campuses, Rockford, IL, USA.
J C SaklesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
M SorbelloAnesthesia and Intensive Care, AOU Policlinico San Marco University Hospital, Catania, Italy.
C A HagbergAnesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Bud Johnson Clinical Distinguished Chair, Department of Anaesthesiology and Peri-operative Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Dalhousie University · CAHomi Bhabha National Institute · INMarconi University · ITMercy Health · USMonash Medical Centre · AUSt. James's Hospital · IEThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity Hospital of Bern · CHUniversity of Arizona · USUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Toronto · CAWarrington Hospital · GBYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple professional groups and societies worldwide have produced airway management guidelines. These are typically targeted at the process of tracheal intubation by a particular provider group in a restricted category of patients and reflect practice preferences in a particular geographical region. The existence of multiple distinct guidelines for some (but not other) closely related circumstances, increases complexity and may obscure the underlying principles that are common to all of them. This has the potential to increase cognitive load; promote the grouping of ideas in silos; impair teamwork; and ultimately compromise patient care. Development of a single set of airway management guidelines that can be applied across and beyond these domains may improve implementation; promote standardisation; and facilitate collaboration between airway practitioners from diverse backgrounds. A global multidisciplinary group of both airway operators and assistants was assembled. Over a 3-year period, a review of the existing airway guidelines and multiple reviews of the primary literature were combined with a structured process for determining expert consensus. Any discrepancies between these were analysed and reconciled. Where evidence in the literature was lacking, recommendations were made by expert consensus. Using the above process, a set of evidence-based airway management guidelines was developed in consultation with airway practitioners from a broad spectrum of disciplines and geographical locations. While consistent with the recommendations of the existing English language guidelines, these universal guidelines also incorporate the most recent concepts in airway management as well as statements on areas not widely addressed by the existing guidelines. The recommendations will be published in four parts that respectively address: airway evaluation; airway strategy; airway rescue and communication of airway outcomes. Together, these universal guidelines will provide a single, comprehensive approach to airway management that can be consistently applied by airway practitioners globally, independent of their clinical background or the circumstances in which airway management occurs.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAirway ManagementHumansairway managementanaesthesiaemergency medicineintensive careprehospital

Identifiers

PMID33165958
PMCPMC7756721
OpenAlexW3105168326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.