Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165881›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2020

SpO2, heart rate, and arterial blood pressure during successful or failed application of non-invasive ventilation after delivery - a single-centre study.

Maria Beata Czeszyńska, Agnieszka Sontowska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria Beata CzeszyńskaDepartment of Neonatology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Agnieszka SontowskaDepartment of Neonatology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSpO2, heart rate, and systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial blood pressure are among the commonly applied and most frequently chosen indicators of well-being of newborns in intensive care units. Objective: to determine the relationship between the aforementioned parameters and the status of newborns depending on the outcome of the Infant Flow (I-F) therapy, and the development of complications in the form of pneumothorax. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective single-centre study covering the years 2009-2014. A total of 182 neonates, with mean gestational age 34.1 weeks and mean body weight 2226 g, were analysed. The minimum and maximum values of the evaluated parameters were analysed statistically according to the therapy outcome noted as success or failure.

resultsA successful outcome of I-F therapy (71.4%) was characterised by higher SpO2 (93.3 ±7.28 vs. 85.9 ±14.77 at P < 0.001; 99.95 ±0.31 vs. 98.6 ±3.30 at P < 0.0001), lower heart rate (122.5 ±12.37 vs. 135.9 ±14.97 at P < 0.0001), and higher max systolic blood pressure (79.05 ±12.49 vs. 69.78 ±13.73 mm Hg at P < 0.0001), max diastolic blood pressure (57.03 ±9.31 vs. 50.41 ±13.82 mm Hg; P < 0.0003), and max as well as min mean arterial blood pressure (46.8 ±10.13 vs. 41.39 ±15.46 mm Hg; P < 0.001) (27.88 ±5.71 vs. 26.14 ±7.35 mm Hg; P < 0.02).

conclusionsIn newborns suffering from respiratory failure and treated with I-F, higher SpO2 values, lower heart rate, and higher arterial blood pressure coincide with success of the I-F therapy.

Indexed as

Noninvasive VentilationArterial PressureContinuous Positive Airway PressureFemaleHeart RateHumansInfant, NewbornMaleOxygenRetrospective StudiesOxygenneonatesnon-invasive ventilationpneumothorax

Identifiers

PMID33165881
PMCPMC10183777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.