Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165880›Full record

ArticleAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2020

Intraoperative haemodynamic optimisation therapy with venoarterial carbon dioxide difference and pulse pressure variation - does it work?

Lívia Prado, Francisco Lobo, Neymar de Oliveira, Daniela Espada, Bárbara Neves, Jean-Louis Teboul, Suzana Lobo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Lívia PradoDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital de Base, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto - SP, Brazil.
Francisco LoboDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital de Base, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto - SP, Brazil.
Neymar de OliveiraIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Base, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto - SP, Brazil.
Daniela EspadaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital de Base, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto - SP, Brazil.
Bárbara NevesDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Hospital de Base, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto - SP, Brazil.
Jean-Louis TeboulService de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de Bicętre, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Sud, Paris, France.
Suzana LoboIntensive Care Unit, Hospital de Base, Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto, São José do Rio Preto - SP, Brazil.
Hospital de Base · BRFaculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto · BRCentre Chirurgical Marie Lannelongue · FRInstituto Andaluz de Ciencias de la Tierra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgorundCurrent evidence suggests that intraoperative goal-directed haemodynamic therapy (GDT) should be considered for high-risk patients undergoing major gastrointestinal surgery. We aimed to evaluate if an algorithm using venoarterial carbon dioxide difference (CO2 gap) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) as therapeutic targets during GDT would decrease the major complications after gastrointestinal surgery.

methodsThis was a before-and-after study (n = 204) performed in a tertiary hospital on patients who underwent elective open major gastrointestinal surgeries. The inclusion criteria were surgeries expected to last more than two hours, family and physician's agreement on total postoperative support, and survival expectancy of at least three months. The exclusion criteria were previous haemodynamic instability, presence of infection, cardiac arrhythmias, and emergency surgery. In the intervention group (IG), an algorithm was applied using fluids, dobutamine, and noradrenaline during the intraoperative period aiming at MAP > 65 mm Hg, SpO2 > 95%, CO2 gap < 6 mm Hg, and PPV < 13%. The control group (CG) comprised consecutive eligible patients who were operated by the same team before the institution of the algorithm.

resultsThe rates of moderate and severe postoperative complications were lower in the IG (11% vs. 23%; IC: RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.246-0.929; P = 0.025). The respective 90- and 180-day mortality rates in the IG and CG were 9.8% vs. 22.5% (P = 0.014) and 12.6% vs. 25.5% (P = 0.020).

conclusionsAn algorithm aiming to minimise the CO2 gap and normalise PPV was feasible and effective in decreasing rates of moderate and severe complications after surgery in high-risk patients.

Indexed as

AgedAlgorithmsBlood PressureCarbon DioxideDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesCarbon Dioxidefluid-responsivenessgoal-directed therapyhigh-risk surgical patientsperioperative hemodynamic optimizationtissue perfusionvenoarterial difference of CO2

Identifiers

PMID33165880
PMCPMC10183785
OpenAlexW3100381236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.