Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165759›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2020

Non-COVID-19 deaths after social distancing in Norway.

Ralph Catalano, Joan A Casey, Tim A Bruckner, Alison Gemmill

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-COVID-19 deaths in times of pandemic.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Ralph CatalanoSchool of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 94720, USA. rayc@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7240-415X
Joan A CaseyDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA.
Tim A BrucknerProgram in Public Health, University of California, Irvine, USA.
Alison GemmillDepartment of Population, Family and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Berkeley Public Health Division · USColumbia University · USJohns Hopkins University · USUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lay persons and policy makers have speculated on how national differences in the imposition of social distancing to reduce SARS CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection has affected non-COVID-19 deaths. No rigorous estimation of the effect appears in the scholarly literature. We use time-series methods to compare non-COVID-19 deaths in Norway during its 9 weeks of mandated social distancing to those expected from history as well as from non-COVID-19 deaths in relatively less restricted Sweden. We estimate that 430 fewer Norwegians than expected died from causes other than COVID-19. We argue that failing to account for averted non-COVID-19 deaths will lead to an underestimate of the benefits of social distancing policies.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlCOVID-19HumansMortalityNorwaySARS-CoV-2Social IsolationSwedenNon-Covid-19 DeathsNorwaySocial Distancing

Identifiers

PMID33165759
PMCPMC7649307
OpenAlexW3102983036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.