Observational studyThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2021
Difference of vascular healing between bioabsorbable-polymer and durable-polymer new generation drug-eluting stents: an optical coherence tomographic analysis.
Observational study in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The comparison of bioabsorbable-polymer and durable-polymer stents has continued to be debated, and there is ongoing concern regarding vascular healing and late stent thrombosis. This study compared the vascular healing at 8-month follow-up by optical coherence tomography (OCT) between 4 different kinds of new generation drug-eluting stents (DESs). We enrolled 112 patients (112 de novo lesions) who underwent OCT guided percutaneous coronary intervention with 4 kinds of new generation DESs including bioabsorbable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EESs), bioabsorbable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stents (BP-SESs), durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents (DP-EESs), and durable-polymer zotarolimus-eluting stents (DP-ZESs) and an 8-month follow-up angiogram and OCT were performed between July 2016 and April 2018. We divided them into two groups, namely BP and DP groups. We compared the OCT parameters including the percentage of uncovered struts, malapposed struts and the mean neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) thickness between the two groups. BP group consisted of 51 lesions (BP-EESs were used in 27, BP-SESs in 24 lesions) and DP group consisted of 61 lesions (DP-EESs were used in 35 and DP-ZESs in 26 lesions). The percentage of uncovered struts and malapposed struts were significantly lower (7.2 ± 8.9 vs. 15.0 ± 17.1%, p = 0.01, 0.9 ± 1.7 vs. 2.7 ± 5.2%, p = 0.03) and the mean NIH thickness was significantly thicker in BP group than DP group (112 ± 54 vs. 83 ± 31 µm, p < 0.01). The present OCT study demonstrated that uncovered struts and malapposed struts were less common with bioabsorbable-polymer stents than with durable-polymer stents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.