Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165648›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2021

Therapeutic drug monitoring of oral targeted antineoplastic drugs.

Anna Mueller-Schoell, Stefanie L Groenland, Oliver Scherf-Clavel, Madelé van Dyk, Wilhelm Huisinga, Robin Michelet, Ulrich Jaehde, Neeltje Steeghs, Alwin D R Huitema, Charlotte Kloft

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 86 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
17.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 195 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The effect of healthcare professional-implemented interventions on adherence to oral targeted therapy in patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Factors associated with medication adherence trajectory among patients treated with oral anticancer drugs: a multicentre cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Anna Mueller-SchoellDept. of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Stefanie L GroenlandDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Oliver Scherf-ClavelInstitute of Pharmacy and Food Chemistry, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Madelé van DykCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Wilhelm HuisingaInstitute of Mathematics, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Robin MicheletDept. of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ulrich JaehdeDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmacy, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Neeltje SteeghsDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Alwin D R HuitemaDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Charlotte KloftDept. of Clinical Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Institute of Pharmacy, Freie Universitaet Berlin, Berlin, Germany. charlotte.kloft@fu-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9344-8514
Freie Universität Berlin · DEThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLFlinders University · AUUniversity of Applied Sciences Potsdam · DEUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Potsdam · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DEUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis review provides an overview of the current challenges in oral targeted antineoplastic drug (OAD) dosing and outlines the unexploited value of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Factors influencing the pharmacokinetic exposure in OAD therapy are depicted together with an overview of different TDM approaches. Finally, current evidence for TDM for all approved OADs is reviewed.

methodsA comprehensive literature search (covering literature published until April 2020), including primary and secondary scientific literature on pharmacokinetics and dose individualisation strategies for OADs, together with US FDA Clinical Pharmacology and Biopharmaceutics Reviews and the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use European Public Assessment Reports was conducted.

resultsOADs are highly potent drugs, which have substantially changed treatment options for cancer patients. Nevertheless, high pharmacokinetic variability and low treatment adherence are risk factors for treatment failure. TDM is a powerful tool to individualise drug dosing, ensure drug concentrations within the therapeutic window and increase treatment success rates. After reviewing the literature for 71 approved OADs, we show that exposure-response and/or exposure-toxicity relationships have been established for the majority. Moreover, TDM has been proven to be feasible for individualised dosing of abiraterone, everolimus, imatinib, pazopanib, sunitinib and tamoxifen in prospective studies. There is a lack of experience in how to best implement TDM as part of clinical routine in OAD cancer therapy.

conclusionSub-therapeutic concentrations and severe adverse events are current challenges in OAD treatment, which can both be addressed by the application of TDM-guided dosing, ensuring concentrations within the therapeutic window.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAdministration, OralAntineoplastic AgentsHumansAntineoplastic AgentsOral anticancer drugsPersonalised medicineTargeted antineoplastic drugsTherapeutic drug monitoringTyrosine kinase inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID33165648
PMCPMC7935845
OpenAlexW3101630206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.