Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165611›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes in India by Individual Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Clinical Factors.

Goutham Swaminathan, Akshay Swaminathan, Daniel J Corsi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Overlap of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pre-eclampsia: A Scoping Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Gestational diabetes: Unfolded area still a concern.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Goutham SwaminathanGoergen Institute for Data Science and University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Akshay SwaminathanQuantitative Sciences, Flatiron Health, New York, New York.
Daniel J CorsiOttawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Flatiron Health (United States) · USUniversity of Ottawa · CAUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Gestational diabetes is common in pregnancy and is associated with adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes. Currently, population-based data on the prevalence of gestational diabetes are limited in India. Objective: To provide a comprehensive national assessment of gestational diabetes in India and its socioeconomic, demographic, and geographic associations, using elevated random blood glucose data as a proxy for a gestational diabetes diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed the fourth National Family Health Survey, conducted in India between January 2015 and December 2016. This nationally representative sample comprised 699 686 women 15 to 49 years of age, of whom 32 428 (4.6%) were pregnant. Data were analyzed between July and December 2019 and between July and August 2020. Exposures: Age, body mass index, hypertension, wealth, and social caste were factors potentially associated with gestational diabetes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Gestational diabetes, defined as elevated random blood glucose according to predetermined thresholds (≥200 mg/dL for nonfasting, ≥92 mg/dL for fasting). Results: Of the 31 746 pregnant women with complete data in the study, the mean (SD) age was 24.3 (4.7) years, and the mean (SD) gestational age was 5.1 (2.3) months. The weighted age-adjusted prevalence of gestational diabetes was 1.3% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.5%). The prevalence of gestational diabetes increased with age, from 1.0% (95% CI, 0.5%-1.5%) at age 15 to 19 years to 2.4% (95% CI, 1.0%-3.8%) at age 35 years or older. The age-adjusted prevalence of gestational diabetes was higher among women with a body mass index of 27.5 or greater (1.8%; 95% CI, 1.0%-2.5%) compared with women with a body mass index of less than 18.5 (0.8%; 95% CI, 0.5%-1.1%), among women in the highest wealth quartile (1.7%; 95% CI, 1.1%-2.5%) compared with those in the lowest (0.9%; 95% CI, 0.7%-1.2%), and women in the south (eg, Kerala: 4.5%; 95% CI, 2.4%-6.7%; Telangana: 5.4%; 95% CI, 0.0%-11.0%) compared with the northeast (eg, Assam: 0.23%; 95% CI, 0.0%-0.48%; Mizoram: 0.16%; 95% CI, 0.0%-0.49%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, considerable variation was found in the prevalence of gestational diabetes by state, socioeconomic status, and demographic factors. This finding has implications for the method of gestational diabetes screening in low-resource settings in India, especially in areas or among demographic groups with lower prevalence.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesDemographyDiabetes, GestationalFemaleGeographyGestational AgeHumansHypertensionIndiaMiddle AgedPregnancyPrevalenceSocial Class

Identifiers

PMID33165611
PMCPMC7653498
OpenAlexW3104007137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.