Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165586›Full record

Trial reportHealth policy and planning2020

Effectiveness of a nutrition education and counselling training package on antenatal care: a cluster randomized controlled trial in Addis Ababa.

Afrah Mohammedsanni Omer, Demewoz Haile, Bilal Shikur, Erlyn Rachelle Macarayan, Seifu Hagos

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health policy and planning, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Afrah Mohammedsanni OmerDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Demewoz HaileDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Bilal ShikurDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Erlyn Rachelle MacarayanHarvard Global Health Institute, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Seifu HagosDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa University · ETHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends the need for a strong nutrition training package for practitioners, including antenatal care (ANC) providers. Without such a training package, ANC visits remain a missed opportunity to address nutritional problems among pregnant women. This study evaluated the effectiveness of an in-service nutrition education and counselling package on the providers' counselling skills during ANC visits. A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. All health-care providers working in ANC units across 20 health centres participated in this study. Health centres were allocated to intervention and control arms using a matched-pair randomization technique. An in-service nutrition education and counselling package, including training for ANC providers, supportive supervision and provision of modules, pamphlets and job aids, was provided for health centres assigned to the intervention arm. Observation checklists were used to assess the counselling skills of health-care providers. We used mixed-effect linear regression to evaluate the impact of the intervention. Significantly more health-care providers in the intervention arm informed pregnant women about the need to have one additional meal (Difference in proportion [DP] 49.17% vs -0.84%; DID 50.0%), about minimum required dietary diversity (DP 72.5% vs -2.5%; DID 75.0%) and about gestational weight gain (DP 68.33% vs -8.33%; DID 76.6%). Furthermore, providers improved in identifying key difficulties that pregnant women face (DP 28.34% vs -2.5%; DID 30.8%), and in recommending simple achievable actions on nutrition during pregnancy (DP 20.8% vs -10.9%; DID 31.6%). The intervention did not have statistically significant effects on how providers informed women about early initiation of breastfeeding (DP 6.67% vs 9.17%; DID -2.5%). The comprehensive in-service nutrition education and counselling package improved how ANC providers engaged with pregnant women and delivered nutrition messages during ANC consultations. This trial was registered in the Pan African Clinical Trial (PACTR registry, PACTR20170900 2477373; Date issued 21 September 2017).

Indexed as

Health EducationPrenatal CareBreast FeedingCounselingEthiopiaFemaleHumansPregnancyAntenatal carecapacity buildinghealth facilitieshealth professionalshealth servicesmaternal healthnutrition educationpregnancyprimary health carerandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID33165586
PMCPMC7649671
OpenAlexW3103702665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.