Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165552›Full record

ArticleInternational health2020

Cohorts as collections of bodies and communities of persons: insights from the SEARCH010/RV254 research cohort.

Gail E Henderson, Stuart Rennie, Amy Corneli, Holly L Peay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Spotlight on global health research.International health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Gail E HendersonDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 347A MacNider, 333 South Columbia Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7240, USA.
Stuart RennieDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, 347A MacNider, 333 South Columbia Street, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7240, USA.
Amy CorneliDepartments of Population Health Sciences and Medicine, School of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, 215 Morris Street, Durham, NC 27701.
Holly L PeayRTI International, 3040 E Cornwallis Rd, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USClinical Research Institute · USRTI International · US

Funding

Integrating Decision Making Studies into HIV Cure Trials: A real-time longitudinal assessmentR01AI127024 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HENDERSON, GAIL E · 2016 to 2019
$2.2M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI127024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal research cohorts are uniquely suited to answer research questions about morbidity and mortality. Cohorts may be comprised of individuals identified by specific conditions or other shared traits. We argue that research cohorts are more than simply aggregations of individuals and their associated data to meet research objectives. They are social communities comprised of members, investigators and organizations whose own interests, identities and cultures interact and evolve over time. The literature describes a range of scientific and ethical challenges and opportunities associated with cohorts. To advance these deliberations, we report examples from the literature and our own research on the Thai SEARCH010/RV254 cohort, comprising individuals diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) during acute infection. We reflect on the impact of cohort experiences and identity, and specifically how people incorporate cohort participation into meaning making associated with their diagnosis, the influence of cohort participation on decision making for early-phase clinical trials recruited from within the cohort, and the impact of the relationships that exist between researchers and participants. These data support the concept of cohorts as communities of persons, where identity is shaped, in part, through cohort experiences. The social meanings associated with cohorts have implications for the ethics of cohort-based research, as social contexts inevitably affect the ways that ethical concerns manifest.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsCohort StudiesHumansInformed ConsentThailandcohort studiescure trialsethicsHIVinformed consentsocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID33165552
PMCPMC7650957
OpenAlexW3099000508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.