Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165550›Full record

ArticleInternational health2020

Towards a fair and transparent research participant compensation and reimbursement framework in Vietnam.

Lucy J Sansom, Trang Pham Nguyen Minh, Iona E Hill, Quyen Nguyen Than Ha, Thuan Dang Trong, Celine Vidaillac, Nhu Dong Quynh, Hugo C Turner, Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil, Dung Nguyen Thi Phuong and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spotlight on global health research.International health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lucy J SansomOxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Trang Pham Nguyen MinhOxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Iona E HillOxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Quyen Nguyen Than HaOxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Thuan Dang TrongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Celine VidaillacOxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nhu Dong QuynhOxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Hugo C TurnerOxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Jennifer Ilo Van NuilOxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Dung Nguyen Thi PhuongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Evelyne KestelynOxford University Clinical Research Unit, University of Oxford, Centre for Tropical Medicine, 764, Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015600/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 096527Wellcome Trust 106680/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProviding compensation for participants in clinical research is well established and while international guidelines exist, defining a context-specific and fair compensation for participants in low-resource settings is challenging due to ethical concerns and the lack of practical, national compensation and reimbursement frameworks.

methodsWe reviewed Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (OUCRU) internal reimbursement documentation over a 10-y period and conducted a scoping literature review to expand our knowledge of compensation and reimbursement practices including ethical concerns. We developed a preliminary reimbursement framework that was presented to community advisory boards (CAB) and clinical investigators to assess its applicability, fairness and transparency.

resultsThe main topics discussed at the workshops centered on fairness and whether the reimbursements could be perceived as financial incentives. Other decisive factors in the decision-making process were altruism and the loss of caregivers' earnings. Investigators raised the issue of additional burdens, whereas the CAB members were focused on non-monetary elements such as the healthcare quality the patients would receive. All elements discussed were reviewed and, where possible, incorporated into the final framework.

conclusionOur new reimbursement framework provides a consistent, fair and transparent decision-making process and will be implemented across all future OUCRU clinical research in Vietnam.

Indexed as

MotivationResearch PersonnelHumansIncomeVietnamethicsLMICsparticipant compensationparticipant reimbursementremuneration frameworkVietnam

Identifiers

PMID33165550
PMCPMC7651161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.