Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165531›Full record

ReviewJournal of animal science2020

Maternal periconceptual nutrition, early pregnancy, and developmental outcomes in beef cattle.

Joel S Caton, Matthew S Crouse, Kyle J McLean, Carl R Dahlen, Alison K Ward, Robert A Cushman, Anna T Grazul-Bilska, Bryan W Neville, Pawel P Borowicz, Lawrence P Reynolds

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of animal science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joel S CatonCenter for Nutrition and Pregnancy, and Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
Matthew S CrouseUSDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE.
Kyle J McLeanDepartment of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN.
Carl R DahlenCenter for Nutrition and Pregnancy, and Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
Alison K WardCenter for Nutrition and Pregnancy, and Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
Robert A CushmanUSDA, ARS, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE.
Anna T Grazul-BilskaCenter for Nutrition and Pregnancy, and Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
Bryan W NevilleCarrington Research Extension Center, Carrington, ND.
Pawel P BorowiczCenter for Nutrition and Pregnancy, and Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
Lawrence P ReynoldsCenter for Nutrition and Pregnancy, and Department of Animal Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND.
North Dakota State University · USRoman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center · USCarrington College · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The focus of this review is maternal nutrition during the periconceptual period and offspring developmental outcomes in beef cattle, with an emphasis on the first 50 d of gestation, which represents the embryonic period. Animal agriculture in general, and specifically the beef cattle industry, currently faces immense challenges. The world needs to significantly increase its output of animal food products by 2050 and beyond to meet the food security and agricultural sustainability needs of the rapidly growing human population. Consequently, efficient and sustainable approaches to livestock production are essential. Maternal nutritional status is a major factor that leads to developmental programming of offspring outcomes. Developmental programming refers to the influence of pre-and postnatal factors, such as inappropriate maternal nutrition, that affect growth and development and result in long-term consequences for health and productivity of the offspring. In this review, we discuss recent studies in which we and others have addressed the questions, "Is development programmed periconceptually?" and, if so, "Does it matter practically to the offspring in production settings?" The reviewed studies have demonstrated that the periconceptual period is important not only for pregnancy establishment but also may be a critical period during which fetal, placental, and potentially postnatal development and function are programmed. The evidence for fetal and placental programming during the periconceptual period is strong and implies that research efforts to mitigate the negative and foster the positive benefits of developmental programming need to include robust investigative efforts during the periconceptual period to better understand the implications for life-long health and productivity.

Indexed as

Animal FeedMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsCattleFemaleFetusHumansLivestockPlacentaPregnancydevelopmental programmingearly pregnancymaternal nutritionoffspring outcomespericonceptual period

Identifiers

PMID33165531
PMCPMC7718859
OpenAlexW3106167694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.