ArticleJAMA internal medicine2021
Potential Cost Implications for All US Food and Drug Administration Oncology Drug Approvals in 2018.
Article in JAMA internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Process Systems Engineering in Precision Medicine: Opportunities in Autologous CAR-T Therapy.Engineering in life sciences · 2026Review
- Estimation of eligibility for and response to CAR-T therapy in the United States.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Article
- A review of new drugs approved by the food and drug administration in 2022.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Review
- Relationships Among Health Insurance Literacy, Financial Toxicity, and Sociodemographic Factors in Patients With Cancer.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- Marketing authorisation and pricing of FDA-approved cancer drugs in Brazil: a retrospective analysis.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2023Article
- Assessment of FDA-Approved Drugs Not Recommended for Use or Reimbursement in Other Countries, 2017-2020.JAMA internal medicine · 2023Article
- Disentangling the Cost of Orphan Drugs Marketed in the United States.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of concomitant fibrates on immunotherapy outcomes for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- Introduction of managed entry agreements in Korea: Problem, policy, and politics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- For Whom the Price Escalates: High Price and Uncertain Value of Cancer Drugs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Identifying Novel Causes of Cancers to Enhance Cancer Prevention: New Strategies Are Needed.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2022Article
- Challenges and Opportunities With Routinely Collected Data on the Utilization of Cancer Medicines. Perspectives From Health Authority Personnel Across 18 European Countries.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- Real-world assessment of attenuated dosing anti-PD1 therapy as an alternative dosing strategy in a high-income country (as defined by World Bank).Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- An urgent call to raise the bar in oncology.British journal of cancer · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: The growth of cancer drug spending in the US has outpaced spending in nearly all other sectors, and an increasing proportion of the drug development pipeline is devoted to oncology. In 2018, there was a record number of drugs entering the US market. Objective: To estimate the number of patients with cancer who are eligible for the newly approved drug-indication pairs, and project potential spending and use of the approvals in the US. Design, Setting, Participants: This is a retrospective review of 2018 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) oncology drug approvals with estimation of the eligible population. The cost of new therapy was estimated, and savings from displaced therapies were subtracted. Two-way sensitivity analysis explored uncertainty in pricing and market diffusion. Data were collected between March 1, 2019, and September 30, 2019. Exposures: Data related to the cancer drug approval (ie, indications, approval pathway, basis for approval), cancer incidence, and drug price were extracted from publicly available sources, including the FDA, National Cancer Institute, and American Cancer Society websites, as well as the RED BOOK database. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the projected net expenditure in the US associated with the new therapies. The secondary outcome described how variable market diffusion and pricing permit expected levels of spending. Results: A total of 46 oncology approvals were included in the analysis, with 17 novel drugs and 29 new indications. The average price per patient per treatment course was $150 384. From a national perspective and with 100% market diffusion, the projected net expenditure for newly approved drugs was $39.5 billion per year. To maintain the recent trend of cancer drug spending, the 2018 cancer drug approvals need to be used in fewer than 20% of eligible patients. Conclusions and Relevance: New cancer drugs approved by the FDA in 2018 would drastically increase cancer drug spending in the US if used widely. Alternatively, only low-level use of the new drugs is consistent with market forecasting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.