Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165337›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2020

Prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 according to socioeconomic and ethnic status in a nationwide Brazilian survey.

Bernardo L Horta, Mariângela F Silveira, Aluísio J D Barros, Fernando C Barros, Fernando P Hartwig, Mariane S Dias, Ana M B Menezes, Pedro C Hallal, Cesar G Victora

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bernardo L HortaUniversidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Mariângela F SilveiraUniversidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Aluísio J D BarrosUniversidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Fernando C BarrosUniversidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Fernando P HartwigUniversidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Mariane S DiasUniversidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Ana M B MenezesUniversidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Pedro C HallalUniversidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Cesar G VictoraUniversidade Federal de Pelotas Pelotas Brazil Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate socioeconomic and ethnic group inequalities in prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the 27 federative units of Brazil.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study, three household surveys were carried out on May 14-21, June 4-7, and June 21-24, 2020 in 133 Brazilian urban areas. Multi-stage sampling was used to select 250 individuals in each city to undergo a rapid antibody test. Subjects answered a questionnaire on household assets, schooling and self-reported skin color/ethnicity using the standard Brazilian classification in five categories: white, black, brown, Asian or indigenous. Principal component analyses of assets was used to classify socioeconomic position into five wealth quintiles. Poisson regression was used for the analyses.

results25 025 subjects were tested in the first, 31 165 in the second, and 33 207 in the third wave of the survey, with prevalence of positive results equal to 1.4%, 2.4%, and 2.9% respectively. Individuals in the poorest quintile were 2.16 times (95% confidence interval 1.86; 2.51) more likely to test positive than those in the wealthiest quintile, and those with 12 or more years of schooling had lower prevalence than subjects with less education. Indigenous individuals had 4.71 (3.65; 6.08) times higher prevalence than whites, as did those with black or brown skin color. Adjustment for region of the country reduced the prevalence ratios according to wealth, education and ethnicity, but results remained statistically significant.

conclusionsThe prevalence of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in Brazil shows steep class and ethnic gradients, with lowest risks among white, educated and wealthy individuals.

Indexed as

Brazilcoronavirus infectionsEpidemiologysocial inequitysurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID33165337
PMCPMC7595003
OpenAlexW3097905084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.