Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165321›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2020

Behavioral Assessment of Visual Function via Optomotor Response and Cognitive Function via Y-Maze in Diabetic Rats.

Kaavya Gudapati, Anayesha Singh, Danielle Clarkson-Townsend, Stephen Q Phillips, Amber Douglass, Andrew J Feola, Rachael S Allen

Erratum issuedAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Stromal-Like Cells and Retinal Pigment Epithelium Modulate Choroidal Sprouting Through Galectin-1-Dependent and Independent Pathways.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaavya Gudapati *Center for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Atlanta VA Medical Center; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Anayesha Singh *Center for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Atlanta VA Medical Center; Department of Neuroscience, Emory University.
Danielle Clarkson-TownsendCenter for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Atlanta VA Medical Center; Gangarosa Department of Environmental Health, Emory University.
Stephen Q Phillips
Amber Douglass
Andrew J FeolaCenter for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Atlanta VA Medical Center; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Rachael S AllenCenter for Visual and Neurocognitive Rehabilitation, Atlanta VA Medical Center; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology; restewa@emory.edu.

Funding

P30-Core Grant for Vision Research Core CP30EY006360 · NEI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI GEISERT, ELDON E · 1986 to 2025
$15.3M
Graduate and Postdoctoral Training in ToxicologyT32ES012870 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carmen Joseph Marsit · 2004 to 2026
$9.1M
Investigating the Impacts of in utero Circadian Disruption on Epigenetic Regulation of Metabolism and DiabetesF31HD097918 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI WALLACE, DANIELLE A. · 2018 to 2020
$126k
Neuroprotective strategies for retinopathy and cognition in diabetesIK1RX002111 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI ALLEN, RACHAEL STEWART · 2016 to 2017
–
The Effect of Estrogen Deficiencies on Vision Loss in GlaucomaIK2RX002342 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI FEOLA, ANDREW J · 2018 to 2023
–
Neuroprotective strategies for retinopathy and cognition in diabetesIK2RX002928 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI ALLEN, RACHAEL STEWART · 2019 to 2023
–
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY006360NICHD NIH HHS F31 HD097918NIEHS NIH HHS T32 ES012870RRD VA IK1 RX002111RRD VA IK2 RX002342RRD VA IK2 RX002928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optomotor response and the Y-maze are behavioral tests useful for assessing visual and cognitive function, respectively. The optomotor response is a valuable tool to track changes in spatial frequency (SF) and contrast sensitivity (CS) thresholds over time in a number of retinal disease models, including diabetic retinopathy. Similarly, the Y-maze can be used to monitor spatial cognition (as measured by spontaneous alternation) and exploratory behavior (as measured by a number of entries) in a number of disease models that affect the central nervous system. Advantages of the optomotor response and the Y-maze include sensitivity, speed of testing, the use of innate responses (training is not needed), and the ability to be performed on awake (non-anesthetized) animals. Here, protocols are described for both the optomotor response and the Y-maze and examples of their use shown in models of Type I and Type II diabetes. Methods include preparation of rodents and equipment, performance of the optomotor response and the Y-maze, and post-test data analysis.

Indexed as

CognitionAnimalsBehavior, AnimalDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2MaleMaze LearningRatsVision, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID33165321
PMCPMC7938890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.