Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33165217›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic drug monitoring2021

Quantitative Method for the Analysis of Ivacaftor, Hydroxymethyl Ivacaftor, Ivacaftor Carboxylate, Lumacaftor, and Tezacaftor in Plasma and Sputum Using Liquid Chromatography With Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Its Clinical Applicability.

Steffie E M Vonk, Marloes van der Meer-Vos, Lieuwe D J Bos, Anne H Neerincx, Christof J Majoor, Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der Zee, Ron A A Mathôt, E Marleen Kemper, Amsterdam Mucociliary Clearance Disease (AMCD) research group

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic drug monitoring, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. CFTR Modulators: Does One Dose Fit All?Journal of personalized medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steffie E M VonkDepartments of Hospital Pharmacy.
Marloes van der Meer-VosDepartments of Hospital Pharmacy.
Lieuwe D J BosRespiratory Medicine, and.
Anne H NeerincxRespiratory Medicine, and.
Christof J MajoorRespiratory Medicine, and.
Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der ZeeRespiratory Medicine, and.
Ron A A MathôtDepartments of Hospital Pharmacy.
E Marleen KemperDepartments of Hospital Pharmacy.
Amsterdam Mucociliary Clearance Disease (AMCD) research group
Respiratory Clinical Trials · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe novel cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators, ivacaftor, lumacaftor, and tezacaftor, are the first drugs directly targeting the underlying pathophysiological mechanism in cystic fibrosis (CF); however, independent studies describing their pharmacokinetics are lacking. The aim of this study was to develop a quantification method for ivacaftor and its 2 main metabolites, lumacaftor and tezacaftor, in plasma and sputum using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry.

methodsThe developed method used a small sample volume (20 µL) and simple pretreatment method; protein precipitation solution and internal standard were added in one step to each sample. Liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry was performed for a total run time of 6 minutes. The method was validated by assessing selectivity, carryover, linearity, accuracy and precision, dilution, matrix effects, and stability.

resultsThe selectivity was good as no interference from matrices was observed. In the concentration range from 0.01 to 10.0 mg/L, calibration curves were linear with a correlation coefficient >0.9997 for all compounds. The within-run and between-run accuracy were between 99.7% and 116% at the lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) and between 95.8% and 112.9% for all concentrations above LLOQ for all analytes in plasma and sputum. Within-run and between-run precisions were <12.7% for LLOQ and <6.7% for the higher limit of quantitation. Samples were stable, with no significant degradation at examined temperatures and time points. Clinical applicability was revealed by analyzing samples from 2 patients with CF.

conclusionsThe presented method enables simultaneous quantification of ivacaftor, lumacaftor, and tezacaftor in plasma and sputum and is an improvement over previous methods because it uses smaller sample volumes, a simple pretreatment protocol, and includes tezacaftor. In future studies, it can be applied for examining pharmacokinetics characteristics of new CF transmembrane conductance regulator modulators.

Indexed as

AminophenolsAminopyridinesBenzodioxolesChromatography, LiquidCystic FibrosisDrug CombinationsHumansIndolesMutationPlasmaQuinolonesSputumTandem Mass SpectrometryAminophenolsAminopyridinesBenzodioxolesDrug CombinationsIndolesivacaftorlumacaftorQuinolonestezacaftor

Identifiers

PMID33165217
PMCPMC8277188
OpenAlexW3099775071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.