ArticleJournal of X-ray science and technology2021
Using artificial intelligence to assist radiologists in distinguishing COVID-19 from other pulmonary infections.
Article in Journal of X-ray science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence for imaging-based COVID-19 detection: Systematic review comparing added value of AI versus human readers.European journal of radiology · 2021Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for tuberculosis control: a scoping review of applications in public health.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Optimising strategies for artificial intelligence-assisted classification of viral pneumonias on CT imaging: a comparative study of selective and default approaches.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Prediction of COVID-19 Hospitalization and Mortality Using Artificial Intelligence.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Identifying immunodeficiency status in children with pulmonary tuberculosis: using radiomics approach based on un-enhanced chest computed tomography.Translational pediatrics · 2023Article
- Deep Learning Methods for Interpretation of Pulmonary CT and X-ray Images in Patients with COVID-19-Related Lung Involvement: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Clinical characteristics and immune profile alterations in vaccinated individuals with breakthrough Delta SARS-CoV-2 infections.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Challenges of Multiplex Assays for COVID-19 Research: A Machine Learning Perspective.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence in the thorax: a narrative review focusing on thoracic radiology.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Review
- Robotics and artificial intelligence in healthcare during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.Robotics and autonomous systems · 2021Review
- The Added Effect of Artificial Intelligence on Physicians' Performance in Detecting Thoracic Pathologies on CT and Chest X-ray: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- The Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Chest Imaging of COVID-19 Patients: A Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Machine learning models for predicting critical illness risk in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.Journal of thoracic disease · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate and rapid diagnosis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is crucial for timely quarantine and treatment. PURPOSE: In this study, a deep learning algorithm-based AI model using ResUNet network was developed to evaluate the performance of radiologists with and without AI assistance in distinguishing COVID-19 infected pneumonia patients from other pulmonary infections on CT scans.
methodsFor model development and validation, a total number of 694 cases with 111,066 CT slides were retrospectively collected as training data and independent test data in the study. Among them, 118 are confirmed COVID-19 infected pneumonia cases and 576 are other pulmonary infection cases (e.g. tuberculosis cases, common pneumonia cases and non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia cases). The cases were divided into training and testing datasets. The independent test was performed by evaluating and comparing the performance of three radiologists with different years of practice experience in distinguishing COVID-19 infected pneumonia cases with and without the AI assistance.
resultsOur final model achieved an overall test accuracy of 0.914 with an area of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.903 in which the sensitivity and specificity are 0.918 and 0.909, respectively. The deep learning-based model then achieved a comparable performance by improving the radiologists' performance in distinguish COVOD-19 from other pulmonary infections, yielding better average accuracy and sensitivity, from 0.941 to 0.951 and from 0.895 to 0.942, respectively, when compared to radiologists without using AI assistance.
conclusionA deep learning algorithm-based AI model developed in this study successfully improved radiologists' performance in distinguishing COVID-19 from other pulmonary infections using chest CT images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.