Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33164982›Full record

ArticleJournal of X-ray science and technology2021

Using artificial intelligence to assist radiologists in distinguishing COVID-19 from other pulmonary infections.

Yanhong Yang, Fleming Y M Lure, Hengyuan Miao, Ziqi Zhang, Stefan Jaeger, Jinxin Liu, Lin Guo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of X-ray science and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yanhong YangDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Fleming Y M LureShenzhen Zhiying Medical Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Hengyuan MiaoTsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Ziqi ZhangTsinghua-Berkeley Shenzhen Institute, Tsinghua University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Stefan JaegerNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Jinxin LiuDepartment of Radiology, Guangzhou Eighth People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lin GuoShenzhen Zhiying Medical Co., Ltd, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate and rapid diagnosis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is crucial for timely quarantine and treatment. PURPOSE: In this study, a deep learning algorithm-based AI model using ResUNet network was developed to evaluate the performance of radiologists with and without AI assistance in distinguishing COVID-19 infected pneumonia patients from other pulmonary infections on CT scans.

methodsFor model development and validation, a total number of 694 cases with 111,066 CT slides were retrospectively collected as training data and independent test data in the study. Among them, 118 are confirmed COVID-19 infected pneumonia cases and 576 are other pulmonary infection cases (e.g. tuberculosis cases, common pneumonia cases and non-COVID-19 viral pneumonia cases). The cases were divided into training and testing datasets. The independent test was performed by evaluating and comparing the performance of three radiologists with different years of practice experience in distinguishing COVID-19 infected pneumonia cases with and without the AI assistance.

resultsOur final model achieved an overall test accuracy of 0.914 with an area of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.903 in which the sensitivity and specificity are 0.918 and 0.909, respectively. The deep learning-based model then achieved a comparable performance by improving the radiologists' performance in distinguish COVOD-19 from other pulmonary infections, yielding better average accuracy and sensitivity, from 0.941 to 0.951 and from 0.895 to 0.942, respectively, when compared to radiologists without using AI assistance.

conclusionA deep learning algorithm-based AI model developed in this study successfully improved radiologists' performance in distinguishing COVID-19 from other pulmonary infections using chest CT images.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceRadiologistsAdultAgedAlgorithmsClinical CompetenceCOVID-19Deep LearningDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansLungMaleMiddle AgedRespiratory Tract InfectionsSARS-CoV-2artificial intelligence (AI)computed tomography (CT)COVID-19deep learning

Identifiers

PMID33164982
PMCPMC7990455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.