Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33164975›Full record

ArticleWork (Reading, Mass.)2020

Work analysis tool for higher education: Development and validation of the german student measure WA-S Screening.

Cornelia Strecker, Thomas Höge, Mirjam Brenner, Alexandra Huber, Melanie Hausler, Stefan Höfer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Work (Reading, Mass.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cornelia StreckerInstitute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Thomas HögeInstitute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Mirjam BrennerInstitute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Alexandra HuberDepartment of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Melanie HauslerDepartment of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Stefan HöferDepartment of Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWork demands, resources and stressors affecting health, well-being and motivation also exist in the work of university students. There is a shortage of measures for analyzing work characteristics in this setting.

objectiveThis article addresses that shortage of measures and describes the development and the validation of the short Work Analysis Measure for Students (WA-S Screening).

methodsIn study 1 (N = 422 students in Austria) the final version of the measure was developed based on analyzing the factor structure and psychometric properties of items and scales. Study 2 (N = 333 German-speaking students in Germany, Austria and Switzerland) was conducted for a cross validation and analyzing the criterion validity.

resultsAn eight-scale structure of the WA-S Screening was supported in study 1 and 2. The scales have shown to be significantly associated with burnout and work engagement in study 2.

conclusionsThe examinations indicate that the WA-S Screening is a short, reliable and valid instrument to identify critical, health-promoting work characteristics in the context of studying at university.

Indexed as

StudentsAustriaGermanyHumansPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandburnoutstudyinguniversityWork characteristicswork engagement

Identifiers

PMID33164975
PMCPMC7836061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.