ArticleJournal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD2020
Impact of Patient Mild Cognitive Impairment on Physician Decision-Making for Treatment.
Article in Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addressing the evidence gap: exploratory insights into dual challenges of mild cognitive impairment and hematologic cancer in older adults through mixed methods and social listening study.European geriatric medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Nurse Practitioners' Experiences Navigating Treatment Decision-Making Affecting Older People with Neurocognitive Disorders and Cancer.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026Article
- Early cognitive screening for individuals on the dementia continuum: A novel approach amid current trends.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2026Review
- Patient and Care Partner Perspective on Potential Undertreatment of Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment for Cardiovascular Disease.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024Article
- A Case of Secondary Pulmonary Hypertension in a Patient With Atrial Septal Defect and Fetal Alcohol Syndrome.Cureus · 2024Article
- Patient Cognitive Status and Physician Recommendations for Cardiovascular Disease Treatment: Results of Two Nationwide, Randomized Survey Studies.Journal of general internal medicine · 2023Article
- Influence of mild cognitive impairment on patient and care partner decision-making for acute ischemic stroke.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2023Article
- Clinical Efficacy of Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Psychiatric and Cognitive Disorders: Protocol for a Systematic Review.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Perspectives on Why Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment Might Receive Fewer Cardiovascular Disease Treatments than Patients with Normal Cognition.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2023Article
- Strategies for Maintaining Brain Health: The Role of Stroke Risk Factors Unique to Elderly Women.Stroke · 2022Review
- The Association Between Mild Cognitive Impairment Diagnosis and Patient Treatment Preferences: a Survey of Older Adults.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- Physician Diagnosis and Knowledge of Mild Cognitive Impairment.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
- How physicians evaluate patients with dementia who present with shortness of breath.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOlder patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) should receive evidence-based treatments when clinically indicated. However, patients with MCI appear less likely than cognitively normal patients to receive evidence-based treatments.
objectiveTo explore the influence of a patient's MCI diagnosis on physician decision-making.
methodsQualitative study of 18 physicians from cardiology, neurology, and internal medicine using semi-structured interviews. We sought to understand whether and how a patient's having MCI has influenced physicians' decisions about five categories of treatments or tests (surgery, invasive tests, non-invasive tests, rehabilitation, and preventive medication). We used qualitative content analysis to identify the unifying and recurrent themes.
resultsMost physician participants described MCI as influencing their recommendations for at least one treatment or test. We identified two major themes as factors that influenced physician recommendations in patients with MCI: Physicians assume that MCI patients' decreased cognitive ability will impact treatment; and physicians assume that MCI patients have poor health status and physical functioning that will impact treatment. These two themes were representative of physician beliefs that MCI patients have impaired independent decision-making, inability to adhere to treatment, inability to communicate treatment preferences, and increased risk and burden from treatment.
conclusionA patient's MCI diagnosis influences physician decision-making for treatment. Some physician assumptions about patients with MCI were not evidence-based. This phenomenon potentially explains why many patients with MCI get fewer effective treatments or tests than cognitively normal patients. Interventions that improve how physicians understand MCI and make decisions for treatments in patients with MCI are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.