Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33164908›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2020

Young People's Attitude Toward Positive Psychology Interventions: Thematic Analysis.

Toni Michel, Franziska Tachtler, Petr Slovak, Geraldine Fitzpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Financial toxicity among older cancer survivors in China: a qualitative study of oncology providers' perceptions and practices.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Toni MichelTechnical University Vienna, Wien, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3330-8880
Franziska TachtlerTechnical University Vienna, Wien, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6668-5573
Petr SlovakKing's College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8458-7715
Geraldine FitzpatrickTechnical University Vienna, Wien, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2013-2188

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigital instantiations of positive psychology intervention (PPI) principles have been proposed to combat the current global youth mental health crisis; however, young people are largely not engaging with available resources.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to explore young people's attitudes toward various PPI principles to find ways of making digital instantiations of them more engaging.

methodsWe conducted an explorative workshop with 30 young people (aged 16-21 years). They rated and reviewed 29 common PPIs. Ratings and recorded discussions were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsSome interventions were conflicting with young people's values or perceived as too difficult. Participants responded positively to interventions that fit them personally and allowed them to use their strengths.

conclusionsValues, context, strengths, and other personal factors are entangled with young people's attitudes toward digital instantiations of PPI principles.

Indexed as

adolescenthealth resourcesmental health

Identifiers

PMID33164908
PMCPMC7683250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.