ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020
Use of Social Media to Promote Cancer Screening and Early Diagnosis: Scoping Review.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prostate cancer research on social media platforms: a bibliometric and thematic analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Measuring the effects of misinformation exposure and beliefs on behavioural intentions: a COVID-19 vaccination study.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2022Pooled it
- The Impact of Morbidity and Disability on Attendance at Organized Breast Cancer-Screening Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Understanding Cancer Information Burden and Quality Concerns: The Roles of Medical Statistics Literacy, Online Health Information Confidence, and Social Media.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- The Impacts of Social Marketing Campaigns on Breast Cancer Awareness and Screening: Scoping Review.JMIR cancer · 2026Article
- "Unmasking Misinformation": Characterizing the Social Media Landscape of Disorders of Consciousness on X (formerly Twitter).Research square · 2026Article
- Validation of a Digital Platform for Colorectal Cancer Risk Stratification and Personalized Screening Recommendations.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- TikTok, Xiaohongshu, and Bilibili as sources of medical information on lung cancer: a multi-platform content evaluation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- A Scoping review of communication strategies and interventions to deliver sexual and reproductive health information among female sex workers.Reproductive health · 2026Article
- Endometrial cancer awareness as a public health blind spot: a cross-sectional survey study.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Leveraging AI for Analysis of Digital Health Information on Cancer Prevention Among Arab Youth and Adults: Content Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2026Article
- Testing the effects of segmented crowdsource-selected messages to improve intentions to follow colorectal cancer screening recommendations: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.BMC public health · 2026Article
- African American and African-Born Black Women's Perspectives and Experiences with a Cervical Health Education and HPV-Self Sampling Intervention.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Social media use and the relationship with colorectal cancer screening among foreign-born populations in the United States.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Article
- Utilising the COM-B model to interpret barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening in young women.Journal of health psychology · 2025Article
- The Role of Online Support, Caregiving, and Gender in Preventative Cancer Genetic Testing Participation: Cross-Sectional Study From a National Study.JMIR cancer · 2025Article
- Review
- Implementing mHealth Apps Through Community Engagement to Promote Cancer Screening: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Roads diverge: mapping the journey towards diagnostic health equity.BMJ open quality · 2025Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSocial media is commonly used in public health interventions to promote cancer screening and early diagnosis, as it can rapidly deliver targeted public health messages to large numbers of people. However, there is currently little understanding of the breadth of social media interventions and evaluations, whether they are effective, and how they might improve outcomes.
objectiveThis scoping review aimed to map the evidence for social media interventions to improve cancer screening and early diagnosis, including their impact on behavior change and how they facilitate behavior change.
methodsFive databases and the grey literature were searched to identify qualitative and quantitative evaluations of social media interventions targeting cancer screening and early diagnosis. Two reviewers independently reviewed each abstract. Data extraction was carried out by one author and verified by a second author. Data on engagement was extracted using an adapted version of the key performance indicators and metrics related to social media use in health promotion. Insights, exposure, reach, and differing levels of engagement, including behavior change, were measured. The behavior change technique taxonomy was used to identify how interventions facilitated behavior change.
resultsOf the 23 publications and reports included, the majority (16/23, 70%) evaluated national cancer awareness campaigns (eg, breast cancer awareness month). Most interventions delivered information via Twitter (13/23, 57%), targeted breast cancer (12/23, 52%), and measured exposure, reach, and low- to medium-level user engagement, such as number of likes (9/23, 39%). There were fewer articles about colorectal and lung cancer than about breast and prostate cancer campaigns. One study found that interventions had less reach and engagement from ethnic minority groups. A small number of articles (5/23, 22%) suggested that some types of social media interventions might improve high-level engagement, such as intended and actual uptake of screening. Behavior change techniques, such as providing social support and emphasizing the consequences of cancer, were used to engage users. Many national campaigns delivered fundraising messages rather than actionable health messages.
conclusionsThe limited evidence suggests that social media interventions may improve cancer screening and early diagnosis. Use of evaluation frameworks for social media interventions could help researchers plan more robust evaluations that measure behavior change. We need a greater understanding of who engages with these interventions to know whether social media can be used to reduce some health inequalities in cancer screening and early diagnosis. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033592.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.