Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33164906›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020

Developing a Predictive Model for Asthma-Related Hospital Encounters in Patients With Asthma in a Large, Integrated Health Care System: Secondary Analysis.

Gang Luo, Claudia L Nau, William W Crawford, Michael Schatz, Robert S Zeiger, Emily Rozema, Corinna Koebnick

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Predicting Continuity of Asthma Care Using a Machine Learning Model: Retrospective Cohort Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gang LuoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7217-4008
Claudia L NauDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0373-2560
William W CrawfordDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Kaiser Permanente South Bay Medical Center, Harbor City, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8447-7532
Michael SchatzDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7640-5560
Robert S ZeigerDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5788-5063
Emily RozemaDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6422-4482
Corinna KoebnickDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-0309
Kaiser Permanente · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

Using Computational Approaches to Optimize Asthma Care ManagementR01HL142503 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI LUO, GANG · 2018 to 2021
$3.3M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL142503
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma causes numerous hospital encounters annually, including emergency department visits and hospitalizations. To improve patient outcomes and reduce the number of these encounters, predictive models are widely used to prospectively pinpoint high-risk patients with asthma for preventive care via care management. However, previous models do not have adequate accuracy to achieve this goal well. Adopting the modeling guideline for checking extensive candidate features, we recently constructed a machine learning model on Intermountain Healthcare data to predict asthma-related hospital encounters in patients with asthma. Although this model is more accurate than the previous models, whether our modeling guideline is generalizable to other health care systems remains unknown.

objectiveThis study aims to assess the generalizability of our modeling guideline to Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC).

methodsThe patient cohort included a random sample of 70.00% (397,858/568,369) of patients with asthma who were enrolled in a KPSC health plan for any duration between 2015 and 2018. We produced a machine learning model via a secondary analysis of 987,506 KPSC data instances from 2012 to 2017 and by checking 337 candidate features to project asthma-related hospital encounters in the following 12-month period in patients with asthma.

resultsOur model reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.820. When the cutoff point for binary classification was placed at the top 10.00% (20,474/204,744) of patients with asthma having the largest predicted risk, our model achieved an accuracy of 90.08% (184,435/204,744), a sensitivity of 51.90% (2259/4353), and a specificity of 90.91% (182,176/200,391).

conclusionsOur modeling guideline exhibited acceptable generalizability to KPSC and resulted in a model that is more accurate than those formerly built by others. After further enhancement, our model could be used to guide asthma care management. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/resprot.5039.

Indexed as

asthmaforecastingmachine learningpatient care managementrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID33164906
PMCPMC7683251
OpenAlexW3101430594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.