Can primary care providers manage obstructive sleep apnea?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. From trenches to technology: a narrative review of sleep medicine in the military.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2024
   Review
2. CPAP resumption after a first termination and impact on all-cause mortality in France.The European respiratory journal · 2024
   Article
3. Management of Sleep-Disordered Breathing in a Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Center: Model of Care Adaptation and Implementation.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Perspectives on primary care management of obstructive sleep apnea: a qualitative study of patients and health care providers.2021

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as