Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33164733›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of rheumatology2020

Putative functional pathogenic autoantibodies in systemic sclerosis.

Devis Benfaremo, Silvia Svegliati Baroni, Lucia Manfredi, Gianluca Moroncini, Armando Gabrielli

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Devis BenfaremoDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9867-2360
Silvia Svegliati BaroniDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6863-2600
Lucia ManfrediDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9313-2197
Gianluca MoronciniDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0380-0105
Armando GabrielliDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4509-8772
Marche Polytechnic University · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma, SSc) is a systemic disease characterized by vascular lesions, fibrosis, and circulating autoantibodies. A complex interplay between innate and adaptive immunity, and with regard to the latter, between humoral and cellular immunity, is believed to be involved in SSc pathogenesis. Lately, close attention has been paid to the role of B cells which, once activated, release profibrotic cytokines, promote profibrotic Th2 differentiation, and produce autoantibodies. Several novel interesting autoantibodies, targeting antigens within the extracellular matrix or on the cell surface, rather than the nuclear antigens of canonical SSc-autoantibodies, have been recently described in patients with SSc. As they show stimulatory or inhibitory activity or react with structures involved in the pathogenesis of SSc lesions, they can be considered as potentially pathogenic. In this paper, we will review those which have been better characterized.

Identifiers

PMID33164733
PMCPMC7647689
OpenAlexW3097897578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.