Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33164618›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2020

Danish general practitioners' management of patients with COPD: a nationwide survey.

Katrine Rutkær Molin, Jens Søndergaard, Peter Lange, Ingrid Egerod, Henning Langberg, Jesper Lykkegaard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katrine Rutkær MolinSection of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jens SøndergaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Peter LangeSection of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ingrid EgerodClinical Nursing, Department of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henning LangbergSection of Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jesper LykkegaardResearch Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Denmark, general practitioners (GPs) have the main responsibility for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management. Internationally, COPD appears to be significantly under-treated, which could be explained by 'therapeutic nihilism' or lack of knowledge.

aimTo investigate: (1) To what extent COPD management provided by GPs includes the core elements of pharmacological treatment, smoking cessation and physical activity, and (2) To what extent GPs need educational support and consulting with a specialist in pulmonary medicine.

designA national cross-sectional web-based survey conducted in April-June 2019. The survey included items on COPD management and educational support needs.

settingDanish general practice. SUBJECTS: A population of approximately 3400 GPs (all GPs in Denmark).

resultsWe received response from 470 GPs (14% response rate). Overall, the respondents reported that they offered COPD management including all relevant treatment elements. Smoking cessation was supported in 58% and physical activity was supported in 23% of the respondents. Future consultations on smoking cessation were planned by 35% and physical activity by 15% respondents. GPs responded to 'needing educational support in COPD management' to a 'high degree' in 8% and to 'some degree' in 43%.

conclusionThe survey suggested that COPD maintenance support provided by GPs seemed to be inadequate regarding smoking cessation and physical activity. Moreover, some GPs expressed a need for educational support in COPD management. More research is needed to understand the potential barriers to evidence-based delivery of COPD-management. Key points In Denmark, general practitioners (GPs) have the main responsibility for the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The present study shows that non-pharmacological interventions such as supporting smoking cessation and particularly promoting physical activity received less attention than pharmacological treatment. The study suggests a need for educational support of the GPs in COPD management.

Indexed as

General PractitionersPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCross-Sectional StudiesDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseeducational supportfamily practicefollow-upgeneral practitionersmanagement

Identifiers

PMID33164618
PMCPMC7782274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.