Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33164349›Full record

ArticleACR open rheumatology2020

Subcutaneous Sarilumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis who Previously Received Subcutaneous Sarilumab or Intravenous Tocilizumab: An Open-Label Extension of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Paul Emery, Hubert van Hoogstraten, Karthinathan Thangavelu, Erin Mangan, Gregory St John, Patrick Verschueren

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACR open rheumatology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01146652 phase3completednot on this map

A Multi-center, Uncontrolled Extension Study Evaluating Efficacy and Safety of SAR153191 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2010 to 2020Enrolled2,023ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmsSAR153191 (REGN88)
NCT01768572 phase3completednot on this map

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study Assessing The Safety and Tolerability of Sarilumab and Tocilizumab In Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Inadequate Responders to or Intolerant of TNF Antagonists

TypeinterventionalSponsorSanofiRan2013 to 2014Enrolled202ConditionsRheumatoid ArthritisArmssarilumab SAR153191 (REGN88), tocilizumab, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, sulfasalazine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul EmeryUniversity of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7429-8482
Hubert van HoogstratenSanofi, Bridgewater, New Jersey.
Karthinathan ThangaveluSanofi Genzyme, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Erin ManganRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York.
Gregory St JohnRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York.
Patrick VerschuerenUniversity Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Tarrytown, USA)Sanofi Genzyme (Cambridge, USA)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis post hoc analysis evaluated the safety and efficacy of open-label sarilumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who completed the phase III double-blind ASCERTAIN study (NCT01768572) and switched from intravenous (IV) tocilizumab to subcutaneous (SC) sarilumab, or who continued SC sarilumab in the open-label extension (OLE) study EXTEND (NCT01146652).

methodsPatients who completed ASCERTAIN were eligible to enroll in EXTEND to receive sarilumab 200 mg SC every 2 weeks (Q2W). Safety and efficacy were reported through 96 weeks in the OLE in patients who switched from tocilizumab IV to sarilumab 200 mg SC Q2W, who switched from sarilumab 150 mg SC Q2W to sarilumab 200 mg SC Q2W, or who continued sarilumab 200 mg SC Q2W.

resultsOf 175 patients who completed ASCERTAIN, 168 (96%) enrolled in EXTEND, and 38 of these patients (23%) discontinued the OLE. Cumulative sarilumab exposure during follow-up was 273.7 patient-years. No new safety signals were identified, infections occurred at a rate of 59.9/100 patient-years, and there were no cases of grade 4 neutropenia. Efficacy-as assessed by Disease Activity Score (28 joints) based on C-reactive protein, Clinical Disease Activity Index, and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index scores-was sustained over 96 weeks of follow-up when switching to, or continuing, sarilumab 200 mg SC Q2W.

conclusionSwitching from IV to SC interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor therapy produced no new safety concerns, and clinical efficacy was sustained over 96 weeks of follow-up. These findings alleviate potential concerns over switching route of administration with interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor therapy for RA.

Identifiers

PMID33164349
PMCPMC7672306

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.