Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33164148›Full record

ArticleMetabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society2020

Workshop report: Toward the development of a human whole stool reference material for metabolomic and metagenomic gut microbiome measurements.

Rupasri Mandal, Raul Cano, Cindy D Davis, David Hayashi, Scott A Jackson, Christina M Jones, Johanna W Lampe, Marie E Latulippe, Nancy J Lin, Katrice A Lippa and 4 more

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. GGut microbes · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Rupasri MandalDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada.
Raul CanoThe BioCollective, LLC, 5650 N Washington St, Denver, CO, 80216, USA.
Cindy D DavisOffice of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20852, USA.
David HayashiMondelez Global, LLC, Chicago, IL, 60607, USA.
Scott A JacksonMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Christina M JonesMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Johanna W LampeFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave N, M4-B802, PO Box 19024, Seattle, WA, 98109, USA.
Marie E LatulippeNorth American Branch of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI North America), 740 15th Street NW, Suite 600, Washington, DC, 20005, USA. mlatulippe@ilsi.org.ORCID 0000-0001-9755-9756
Nancy J LinMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Katrice A LippaMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Paulina PiotrowskiMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Sandra M Da SilvaMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
Kelly S SwansonUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
David S WishartDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada.

Funding

Upgrade Laboratories Facilities at UPR-Rio PiedrasR25GM061151 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RIO PIEDRAS · PI CARBALLEIRA, NESTOR MANUEL · 2001 to 2023
$32.5M
RIO PIEDRAS MARC U*STAR DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMT34GM007821 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO RIO PIEDRAS · PI CARBALLEIRA, NESTOR MANUEL · 1985 to 2020
$20.3M
Program in Postdoctoral Research Training in AnesthesiologyT32GM075774 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAPNA R KUDCHADKAR, Emmett E Whitaker · 2006 to 2026
$8.1M
Mechanisms of Developmental Anesthesia ToxicityR01GM120519 · NIGMS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI MINTZ, CYRUS DAVID · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
Reference standards for quality control and data validation in microbiome studiesR44GM134710 · NIGMS · BIOCOLLECTIVE, LLC · PI CANO, RAUL J · 2019 to 2021
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120519NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM061151NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM134710NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM075774NIGMS NIH HHS T34 GM007821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo date, there has been little effort to develop standards for metabolome-based gut microbiome measurements despite the significant efforts toward standard development for DNA-based microbiome measurements.

objectivesThe National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), The BioCollective (TBC), and the North America Branch of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI North America) are collaborating to extend NIST's efforts to develop a Human Whole Stool Reference Material for the purpose of method harmonization and eventual quality control.

methodsThe reference material will be rationally designed for adequate quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) for underlying measurements in the study of the impact of diet and nutrition on functional aspects of the host gut microbiome and relationships of those functions to health. To identify which metabolites deserve priority in their value assignment, NIST, TBC, and ILSI North America jointly conducted a workshop on September 12, 2019 at the NIST campus in Gaithersburg, Maryland. The objective of the workshop was to identify metabolites for which evidence indicates relevance to health and disease and to decide on the appropriate course of action to develop a fit-for-purpose reference material.

resultsThis document represents the consensus opinions of workshop participants and co-authors of this manuscript, and provides additional supporting information. In addition to developing general criteria for metabolite selection and a preliminary list of proposed metabolites, this paper describes some of the strengths and limitations of this initiative given the current state of microbiome research.

conclusionsGiven the rapidly evolving nature of gut microbiome science and the current state of knowledge, an RM (as opposed to a CRM) measured for multiple metabolites is appropriate at this stage. As the science evolves, the RM can evolve to match the needs of the research community. Ultimately, the stool RM may exist in sequential versions. Beneficial to this evolution will be a clear line of communication between NIST and the stakeholder community to ensure alignment with current scientific understanding and community needs.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMetabolomeMetagenomeDietFecesHumansMetabolomicsMetagenomicsDietMetabolitesMetabolomicsMetagenomicsNutrition

Identifiers

PMID33164148
PMCPMC7649161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.