ArticleWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2020
Biochemical tests to determine the biodegradability potential of bacterial strains in PAH polluted sites.
Article in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cyanobacterial biocrust alters soil physical properties reducing soil erosion and aerosol production.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the use of degrading-bacteria is one of the most efficient methods for the bioremediation of polluted sites, detection, selection and proliferation of the most efficient and competing bacteria is still a challenge. The objective of this multi-stage research was to investigate the effects of the selected bacterial strains on the degradation of anthracene, florentine, naphthalene, and oil, determined by biochemical tests. In the first stage, using the following tests: (a) biosurfactant production (emulsification, oil spreading, number of drops, drop collapse, and surface tension), (b) biofilm production, (c) activity of laccase enzyme, and (d) exopolysaccaride production, the three bacterial strains with the highest degrading potential including Bacillus pumilus, B. aerophilus, and Marinobacter hydrocarbonoclasticus were chosen. In the second stage using the following tests: (a) bacterial growth, (b) laccase enzyme activity, and (c) biosurfactant production (emulsification, oil spreading, and collapse of droplet) the degrading ability of the three selected bacterial strains plus Escherichia coli were compared. Different bacterial strains were able to degrade anthracene, florentine, naphthalene, and oil by the highest rate, three days after inoculation (DAI). However, M. hydrocarbonoclasticus showed the highest rate of florentine degradation. Although with increasing pollutant concentration the degrading potential of the bacterial strains significantly decreased, M. hydrocarbonoclasticus was determined as the most efficient bacterial strain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.