ArticleJournal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy2020
Blood Pressure and Mortality: Joint Effect of Blood Pressure Measures.
Article in Journal of clinical cardiology and cardiovascular therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Age, Sex, and Waist-to-Height Ratio Approach the Discrimination of Fifty-Four Model Inputs for Prevalent Hypertension: An Explainable Machine Learning Analysis of the Chilean National Health Survey.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A scoping review of neuromodulation techniques for controlling blood pressure: what are the ups and downs to this approach?Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Review
- Association Between Chewing Status and Steatotic Liver Disease in Japanese People Aged ≥50 Years: A Cohort Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Increased Waist Circumference after One-Year Is Associated with Poor Chewing Status.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Epigenetic Age Mediates the Association of Life's Essential 8 With Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Article
- The magnitude and direction of the relationship between risk factor and cognition depends on age: a pooled analysis of 5 community-based studies.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- A cross-sectional analysis on hypertension: Exploring the impact of lifestyle modifications and antihypertensive drug adherence in Sudan.ARYA atherosclerosis · 2024Article
- Relationship between Chewing Status and Fatty Liver Diagnosed by Liver/Spleen Attenuation Ratio: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Allostatic load as predictor of mortality: a cohort study from Lolland-Falster, Denmark.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity and All-Cause Mortality: Findings From the Health and Retirement Study.Innovation in aging · 2022Article
- Cardiometabolic Risk Trajectory Among Older Americans: Findings From the Health and Retirement Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2021Article
- Sex and body mass index dependent associations between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and pulse pressure in middle-aged and older US adults.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We examine how combinations of systolic and diastolic blood pressure levels and pulse pressure levels predicted mortality risk. Respondents are those aged over 50 from the Health and Retirement Study (N=10,366) who provided blood pressure measures in 2006/2008. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured three times; and we averaged the three readings. Pulse pressure was calculated as systolic minus diastolic blood pressure. Seven combinations of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (low/normal/high of each) and three levels of pulse pressure (low/normal/high) were used to categorize blood pressure. Over 1 to 10 years of follow-up (average follow-up time of 7.8 years), 2,820 respondents died after blood pressure measurement in 2006/2008. Potential covariates including age, gender, education, BMI, total cholesterol, HbA1c, antihypertensive medication intake and lifetime-smoking pack years were adjusted in Cox proportional hazard models and survival curves. The blood pressure subgroup with low systolic blood pressure (<90 mmHg) and low diastolic blood pressure (< 60 mmHg) had the highest relative risk of mortality (HR=2.34, 95% CI: 1.45-3.80), followed by those with normal systolic blood pressure but low diastolic blood pressure (HR=1.45, 95% CI: 1.17-1.81) among those with cardiovascular conditions at baseline. For those without cardiovascular conditions at baseline, low blood pressure, either systolic or diastolic, was not related to mortality. Those with high levels of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure had a higher risk of mortality than those with both blood pressures normal but no other subgroups with low blood pressure differed from normal/normal in predicting mortality. Pulse pressure did not predict mortality. How high and low blood pressures are related to mortality needs to be examined by jointly looking at systolic and diastolic blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.