Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33163942›Full record

ReviewiScience2020

The Merging of Biological and Electronic Circuits.

Jonathan J Y Teo, Rahul Sarpeshkar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in iScience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Drug Cocktail Formulation via Circuit Design.IEEE transactions on molecular, biological, and multi-scale communications · 2023
    Article
  6. A Compact and Power-Efficient Noise Generator for Stochastic Simulations.IEEE transactions on circuits and systems. I, Regular papers : a publication of the IEEE Circuits and Systems Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jonathan J Y TeoComputational and Systems Biology Program at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Rahul SarpeshkarDepartments of Engineering, Microbiology & Immunology, Physics, and Molecular and Systems Biology, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.

Funding

High Performance Simulation Libraries for Systems BiologyR01GM123032 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SAURO, HERBERT M. · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM123032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological circuits and systems within even a single cell need to be represented by large-scale feedback networks of nonlinear, stochastic, stiff, asynchronous, non-modular coupled differential equations governing complex molecular interactions. Thus, rational drug discovery and synthetic biological design is difficult. We suggest that a four-pronged interdisciplinary approach merging biology and electronics can help: (1) The mapping of biological circuits to electronic circuits via quantitatively exact schematics; (2) The use of existing electronic circuit software for hierarchical modeling, design, and analysis with such schematics; (3) The use of cytomorphic electronic hardware for rapid stochastic simulation of circuit schematics and associated parameter discovery to fit measured biological data; (4) The use of bio-electronic reporting circuits rather than bio-optical circuits for measurement. We suggest how these approaches can be combined to automate design, modeling, analysis, simulation, and quantitative fitting of measured data from a synthetic biological operational amplifier circuit in living microbial cells.

Indexed as

BioelectronicsElectrical EngineeringEngineering

Identifiers

PMID33163942
PMCPMC7607449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.