ArticleJCO precision oncology2020
Tumor Genomic Profiling Practices and Perceptions: A Survey of Physicians Participating in the NCI-MATCH Trial.
Article in JCO precision oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Physicians' Perspectives on Access to Innovative Oncology Therapies: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Bulgaria.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Prospective Evaluation of Structure-Based Simulations Reveal Their Ability to Predict the Impact of Kinase Mutations on Inhibitor Binding.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2025Article
- Molecular analysis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a real-world study from high-volume French centres (CAPANCOBIO study).ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Prospective evaluation of structure-based simulations reveal their ability to predict the impact of kinase mutations on inhibitor binding.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Agnostic Administration of Targeted Anticancer Drugs: Looking for a Balance between Hype and Caution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- National Cancer Institute Combination Therapy Platform Trial with Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (ComboMATCH).Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023Article
- Article
- Implementation and Clinical Adoption of Precision Oncology Workflows Across a Healthcare Network.The oncologist · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo identify factors that may influence physician participation in tumor profiling studies and to assess the routine use of tumor profiling in clinical practice.
methodsPhysicians in the National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) were invited to participate in an electronic survey consisting of 73 questions related to participation in genomic profiling studies, tumor profiling practices and education during usual patient care, and physician background and practice characteristics.
resultsThe survey response rate was 8.9% (171 surveys returned of 1,931 sent). A majority of respondents practiced in academic medical centers (AMCs). Participation in NCI-MATCH increased workload and cost but resulted in increased professional satisfaction, confidence in treatment recommendation, and subsequent use of tumor profiling. Barriers to patient participation included length of wait time for results and lack of a therapeutic option from the testing. Physicians who worked in AMCs reported a higher use of tumor profiling than did those who worked in non-AMC settings (43%
conclusionPhysicians who participate in NCI-MATCH perceive value to patient treatment that outweighs the additional effort required; survey results help identify barriers that may limit participation. The current findings have implications for the design of future genomic and other profiling studies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.