Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33163840›Full record

ArticleHepatology communications2020

Internet Published Policies Regarding Liver Transplant Eligibility and Substance Use in United States Transplant Centers.

Margarita N German, Jason L Eccleston, Diego A Tamez, Patrick L Remington, Michael R Lucey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hepatology communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Margarita N GermanDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA.
Jason L EcclestonDepartment of Medicine University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-3105
Diego A TamezDepartment of Population Health Sciences University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA.
Patrick L RemingtonDepartment of Population Health Sciences University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA.
Michael R LuceyDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health Madison WI USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver transplant centers in the United States retain great autonomy in determining eligibility criteria for a liver transplant. This study aims to define the availability and content of liver transplant centers' publicly available Internet policies regarding eligibility criteria for liver transplant. Three trained undergraduate students performed a structured pilot-tested assessment of official websites of the United Network for Organ Sharing-registered liver transplant centers. All 141 liver transplant centers had an accessible website. Some account of eligibility criteria was provided by 53% of centers, while 32% of centers discussed substance use. Only 17% discussed their policy regarding alcohol use in candidates with underlying alcohol use disorder, and only 2% stipulated that 6 months of abstinence was required. While exclusion based on substance use or age was discussed infrequently, insurance coverage requirements, the need for social support, and the need for adherence to medical care were mentioned in 21%, 37%, and 23% of centers, respectively.

Identifiers

PMID33163840
PMCPMC7603533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.