Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33163827›Full record

ArticleGeoHealth2020

Environmental Association of Burning Agricultural Biomass in the Indus River Basin.

Moiz Usmani, Ashish Kondal, Jun Wang, Antarpreet Jutla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GeoHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Analyzing asymmetric impact of economic growth, energy use, FDI inflows, and oil prices on COEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moiz UsmaniGeohealth and Hydrology Laboratory (GeoHLab), Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-8387
Ashish KondalDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering Washington State University Pullman Washington USA.
Jun WangDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering The University of Iowa Iowa City IA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7334-0490
Antarpreet JutlaGeohealth and Hydrology Laboratory (GeoHLab), Department of Environmental Engineering Sciences University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8191-2348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intensification of smog episodes, following harvesting of paddy crops in agricultural plains of the Indus basin in the Indian subcontinent, are often attributed to farming practice of burning standing stubble during late autumn (October, November) months. Biomass burning (paddy stubble residual) is a preferred technique to clear farmlands for centuries by farmers in that basin. However, despite stable agricultural landholding and yield, smog is being increasingly associated with burning agricultural biomass, thus creating a paradox. Here, we show that the concentration of smog (NOx, PM

Indexed as

Biomass burningDew‐point temperatureSmog

Identifiers

PMID33163827
PMCPMC7597142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.