ArticleACS omega2020
Nanohydroxyapatite-, Gelatin-, and Acrylic Acid-Based Novel Dental Restorative Material.
Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancements in nanohydroxyapatite: synthesis, biomedical applications and composite developments.Regenerative biomaterials · 2025Review
- Article
- Bioactivity Evaluation of Biphasic Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitutes Immersed and Grown with Supersaturated Calcium Phosphate Solution.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Methylene Blue Dye Adsorption from Wastewater Using Hydroxyapatite/Gold Nanocomposite: Kinetic and Thermodynamics Studies.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to prepare a novel dental restorative material (NDRM) and to understand its cell viability behavior. The hydroxyapatite (HA) nanopowder was synthesized using a wet chemical precipitation method using calcium hydroxide and orthophosphoric acid as precursors. The as-prepared HA nanopowder was annealed at different temperatures to get a pure compound with a Ca/P ratio close to 1.67. The optimal temperature was found to be 600 °C, whereas at a higher temperature, HA starts decomposing into CaO. The preparation of NDRM was conducted in two steps. The first step comprises the preparation of HA nanopowder- and gelatin (G)-based film using microwave heating. In the second step, the homogenized mixture of the HA-G film was mixed with different amounts of acrylic acid to form a self-flowable NDRM paste. Further, both these materials (HA nanopowder and NDRM) were characterized using FTIR, XRD, and SEM-EDX analyses. The FTIR and XRD results show the peaks corresponding to natural bone apatite and therefore confirm the formation of HA. EDX results showed the presence of Ca and P in HA nanopowder and NDRM with Ca/P ratios of 1.79 and 1.63, respectively. Synthesized NDRM was also analyzed for its
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.